反馈
👍1
Signed Nachoneko

Channel
@Nachonek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
973subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004338792971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nachonek |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nachonek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 973 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 969 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 969 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,854 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
45 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 46.7% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 31.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
反馈
👍1
Signed Nachoneko
引流明天给你们发国际服直装
Signed Nachoneko
https://wyqk.cn/s/MYNNB 备用卡网:https://shop.zmfaka.cn/shop/xuegao 备用卡网也有这些号 从购买那一刻开始录屏到登陆才可给予售后,购买后售后时间为10分钟 没有录屏做废 售后:@liize91 从购买那一刻开始录屏到登陆才可给予售后 没有录屏一律不售后
Signed 雾雨
修复人机没效果
Signed Nachoneko
猫羽雫正式服 2.7更新内容 全面适配香肠派对25.16 修复吸人机无效果 每一次更新都需要删掉配置文件否则可能会出现BUG 防止有人倒卖圈钱 公益卡密: MYANB666(点击卡密可直接复制) 配置路径 /storage/emulated/0/配置.txt 小猫老师主推香肠派对直登账号 https://wyqk.cn/s/MYNNB 售后 @liize91 @Nachoneko123_bot 要免手续费也找售后 公益频道 https://t.me/Nachonek 聊天频道 https://t.me/+VLTFd8JYJqJjZjgx
☃2
Signed Nachoneko
吸人机有没有效果?
❤2👍2
Signed Nachoneko
13615305887 给我短信轰炸他 造谣我卖假卡 反正找我们买号的我都售后了
Signed 雾雨
想不想笑
👍3😁1
Signed 雾雨
谁能绷得住
👍3
Signed Nachoneko
现在才想起来发测试完忘记发了跑去刷视频了😄
Signed Nachoneko
猫羽雫正式服 2.6更新内容 全面适配香肠派对25.16 添加快捷自瞄按钮 添加新功能 每一次更新都需要删掉配置文件否则可能会出现BUG 防止有人倒卖圈钱 公益卡密: MYANB666(点击卡密可直接复制) 配置路径 /storage/emulated/0/配置.txt 小猫老师主推香肠派对直登账号 https://wyqk.cn/s/MYNNB 售后 @liize91 @Nachoneko123_bot 要免手续费也找售后 公益频道 https://t.me/Nachonek 聊天频道 https://t.me/+VLTFd8JYJqJjZjgx
❤5
Signed Nachoneko
反馈
Signed 雾雨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nachonek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 229,302 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nachoneko公益频道” (@Nachonek), 973 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nachonek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.