Channel
@NOFACE_COD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,097subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004490067909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NOFACE_COD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NOFACE_COD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 2,097 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 2,094 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 2,089 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 2,089 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (25 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,060 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 11 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 20.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩸🩸🩸 ادام کلی 😈 اسکای فست😈 🩸🩸🩸 کسرا نات پی ام💦🍑 سایلنس🍑💦 ⭕️بسمالله این کص ننه چند روز پیش بع پوکویو ناموسی زد نشستم وان وی وان ننشو کفن کردم امروز هم ناموسی داد محسن ۲۵ صفر زدش بعد گفت ۲ به ۲ عم زدیمش گردن هم گرفت کص ننت به من نمیخوری ننه جنده ی کص ننه 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️
Signed 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐞𝐬𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭 ( 𝐎𝐅𝐅 ) 𝟏𝟗:𝟐𝟐
🔠🔠🔠 ادام کلی 👹 وای سی تی 👹 اسکای فست 👹 نیکولاس 👻 🔠🔠🔠 نوپرابلم یا همون اردک💦 بقیع هم بیهویت ⭕️بسمالله این کص ننه ها ناموسی دادن گفتن زدیم اکانتتو بدع نفوذی انداختن تو تیممون راند اولو گایدیم ۲ بع ۵ راند دوم وای سی تی آمد زدیم راند ۲ وم هم زدیم گایدیم کص ننتون هویت میگیرید مادر جنده ها کص ننتون نمیپدازیم 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️
Signed 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐞𝐬𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭 ( 𝐎𝐅𝐅 ) 𝟏𝟗:𝟎𝟔
🩸🩸🩸 اسکای فست👹 ادام کلی👹 ساواک👹 کابوی👹 🩸🩸🩸 امیر لعو💦💦 ⭕️بسمالله این کص ننه تو سروش خایمال من بود بگیرم رو کابوی نگرفتم ننشو گاید کابوی جلو ۲۰ نفر تو کال کیر شد از اونجا میسوزه بعد من یه جور ننه ی اینو گایدم فینیش شات وان بی وان همچی ننه این زیاد گایدیم این تیم نداره کص ننه مادر فلج کص ننه اون لعو پلی که تو ازش میری بالا ما ۶ تا فول تست مایک یه وار یوز و ۵۰ تا شات ازش گذاشتیم البوم توهم هست کص ننه سروشی تو از …
Signed 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐞𝐬𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭 ( 𝐎𝐅𝐅 ) 𝟏𝟔:𝟏𝟖
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 11:32
𝕎𝕚𝕟 𝙽𝙾𝙵𝙰𝙲𝙴 𝙼𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚎𝙻 𝚃𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚒 𝙾𝚉𝚄𝚌𝚑𝚒𝙷𝚊 𝚄𝚌𝚑𝚒𝙷𝚊 𝙵𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚃𝙾𝙿 𝚃𝚎𝚊𝚖 𝕃𝕠𝕤𝕖 𝚅𝚃𝚇 . 𝟹𝟹𝟹 𝙽𝚒𝚇 > 𝚏𝚊𝚛𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝙽𝚒𝚇 > 𝙼-𝙰𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚌 𝙽𝚒𝚇 > 𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚍 𝙽𝚒𝚇 > 𝙱𝚊𝚝𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙲𝚕𝚊𝚗 𝚅𝚃𝚇 𝙲𝚕𝚊𝚗 𝙽𝚒𝚇 کلن VTX و کلن NiX تیم آوردن گاییده شدن😂
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 11:12
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥2
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 18:18
کیر گوزی کردی ننت کص شد خایه مال😂 Win ℕ𝕆𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼⚜ ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝔹𝕠𝕪⚜ 𝕄𝕒𝕙𝕚𝕤𝕒⚜ Lose ℝ𝕚𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕊𝕔𝕠𝕡𝕖𝕍𝕖𝕫𝕖 ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕟( 𝔸𝟜 )
🔥4
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 18:18
پسر قشنگم🥹❤️
Signed Mahisa
𝕀'𝕄 ℕ𝕆𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼 𝑀𝓎 𝐿𝑜𝓋𝑒 : 𝐌𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐚💖 🩸(((MY BᄂӨӨDY)))🩸 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐥 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐟𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐌𝐢 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐛𝐨𝐲 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐟𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐚 𝐅𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐥 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐏𝐚𝐲𝐭𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍 𝐇𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐢𝐧 𝐘𝐂𝐓 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐨 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐚𝟖𝟖𝟖 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢 𝐊𝐚𝐢𝐣𝐮 𝐊𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢 𝐕𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐑 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐭𝐚 𝐅𝐞𝐋𝐚𝐤𝐨𝐰 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐆 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐡 𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐥𝐢 𝐓𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐱 𝐀𝐦𝐢𝐫𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐌𝐎𝐄𝐈𝐍𝟓𝟓𝟓 𝐄𝐝𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐊𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐛 𝐌𝐌𝐃𝐓𝐢𝐓𝐀𝐍 𝐌𝐈𝐊𝐀𝐄𝐈𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐃𝐌 𝐏𝐢𝐦𝐨 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐱 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐬 𝐌𝐈𝐊𝐀𝐄𝐈𝐋 𝐓𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐦𝐞𝐠𝐚 𝐀𝐫𝐲𝐚 𝐕𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐱 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐀𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐥𝐢 𝐭𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐲 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐨𝐂𝐨𝐲𝐨 𝐢𝐖𝐚𝐬𝐕𝐞𝐝…
❤🔥9
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 11:45
کث ننه بدخواه ارشیا
👍2
Signed 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐞𝐬𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟎𝟗:𝟎𝟕
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 16:34
خب خب ونوم مادر جنده پروندت بسته شد بعد سه ماه گوه خوری دعوت زدی اومدیم روم خودت بازم خایه کردی. بنازم غیرت تو و سهیلDM4 جفتتونم ناموستونو فروختید ولی بازم نتونستید منو بزنید😂 Win NOFACE Hellboy Partisan Paytowin REVN Lose Sohail DM4(بی غیرت) Venom(بی غیرت) DM4 team Clan (DM4) حالا حالا باید تلاش کنی به ما برسی این بچه سال بازیا کیک دادن و اسپکت نشستنو ما خیلی وقته پیش انجام میدادیم پسرم.
Signed 𝐍𝐎^𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 16:34
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NOFACE_COD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,049,218 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐂𝐨𝐝 | 𝐍Ø𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄 مهیسا تاج سرم” (@NOFACE_COD), 2,097 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NOFACE_COD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.