Channel
@NJKF910611
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,055subscribers
+165 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002126724984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NJKF910611 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NJKF910611 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 3,055 | +74 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 2,981 | +81 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,900 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 2,890 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (23 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,862 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎯秦淮夫子庙🎯🎯🚹🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎 全场价格: 499😀 💞全场Hi选，年均20-26岁💞😎😎 1️⃣半裸服务，技师半裸你全裸，上下可以摸，丝袜随便撕，到店任意挑选，满意为止，不满意秒换，出货方式手足，可手法可足交，免费泡澡，出货不限次数，停车方便 2️⃣服务满意了前台买单，支持现金-微信-支付宝-花呗-信用卡 3️⃣预约咨询: @NJ12025 【预约】 4️⃣技师好评: @TYB910611 5️⃣技师出勤: @NJKF910611 6️⃣交流群组: @SP012025 【聊天】
Signed 南京高端spa上官
秦淮夫子庙今日出勤:【免费泡澡】【海选模式】 预约咨询 : @NJ12025 官方电话: 19848202270 聊天交流: @SP012025
Signed 南京高端spa上官
💥秦淮18号💥颜值巅峰 这一款不用多说 可能有些兄弟曾经玩过她，她曾担任过杭州 苏州 合肥封多地培训师 颜值不用说 服务顶呱呱 预约咨询: @NJ12025 😀😃😄😆❤️❤️
Signed 南京高端spa上官
自2026年5月1日起，兄弟们到我司旗下任意门店消费，不限于本地门店，均可参与积分累积，1人次1分，2人2分，以此类推，5分即可兑换半价卷1张，换后次数扣除可继续累积，此分由【上官】记录 杭州-苏州-南京-合肥-芜湖-湖州-成都
Signed 南京高端spa上官
💥秦淮77号💥好评 感谢兄弟们的信任与支持， 你的好评是对我最大的动力 预约咨询: @NJ12025 😀😃😄😆❤️❤️
❤1
Signed 南京高端spa上官
💥秦淮08号💥好评 培训师果然不一样，给大哥整开心了，喜欢的兄弟闭眼冲 这个不好你打我 预约咨询: @NJ12025 😀😃😄😆❤️❤️
Signed 南京高端spa上官
💥秦淮08号💥颜值巅峰 颜值高 身材好 服务棒 尺度大 配合度高，人美多汁，皮肤光滑柔软，奶子丰满有质感，身材苗条大长腿，喜欢的兄弟闭眼冲 预约咨询: @NJ12025 ❤️❤️ 😀😃😄😆❤️❤️
❤1
Signed 南京高端spa上官
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @NJKF910611. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 777,180 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南京实体丝足spa92” (@NJKF910611), 3,055 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NJKF910611.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.