Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 南部挡案馆(曝光) @NBDAG888

Channel

南部挡案馆(曝光) @NBDAG888

@NBDAG888

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,738subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001179188668
TypeChannel
Username@NBDAG888
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NBDAG888

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,7383,8093,773.513 September 2026 — 3,809 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,790 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,758 subscribers29 September 2026 — 3,738 subscribers13 September 202629 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,727–3,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 20:173,738-20
19 Sept 2026, 10:143,758-32
15 Sept 2026, 00:383,790-19
13 Sept 2026, 21:223,809first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.2%
avg views ÷ 3,738 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held6 (12 September 2026 – 13 September 2026)
Views total11,810
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 13 September 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 哈尔滨炮坊 📢 东南亚黑料曝光 📢 soso吃瓜-吃瓜atTop🔥 📢 181吃瓜 🍉 黑料网 📢 SOSO吃瓜 - 吃瓜TOP🔥 📢 内涵吃瓜-吃瓜Top 📢 东南亚曝光-黑料-吃瓜 📢 吃瓜群众|主播爆料|黑料站💞 📢 东南亚最新曝光,新闻 📢 老司机吃瓜 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励

13 Sept 2026, 02:46 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🚨 诈骗曝光 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 欺诈者昵称: 黑HI技客服 ✏️欺诈者账号: @HJIkefu888 ‼️欺诈者TGID: 6141667197 💸欺诈金额:80.00u 🚫欺诈地址:TBp6kHhkf8QqNDKUsbm8RMpTWFAtkuQe8W 📝 被骗说明:购买Tk检存软件,给我发了一个压缩文件,里面的文件打不开,电脑还中毒了,现在联系不上了,一直也不回。 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 请注意防范,避免上当受骗! 遇到骗子点我 ✉️ @NBDAG_bot 提交举报! ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📱官方大群: @NBDAG688

12 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🚨 诈骗曝光 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 欺诈者昵称: 小苹果 ✏️欺诈者账号: @XGLM_88809736541 ‼️欺诈者TGID: 1615544724 💸欺诈金额:2000.00u 🚫欺诈地址:TTcTNNUV64RHfxNA2tMXvvWAQSXXXXXXXX 📝 被骗说明:合作了好几个月了,上个月收完续费钱和其他的钱就跑路了,鲜果联盟工作室的,他们号商全跑路了,狗东西,上个号也全顶走,海华上押的钱也退掉了,现在装死不回消息 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 请注意防范,避免上当受骗! 遇到骗子点我 ✉️ @NBDAG_bot 提交举报! ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📱官方大群: @NBDAG688

12 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,260 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🚨 诈骗曝光 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 欺诈者昵称: 信天 江南 ✏️欺诈者账号: @JN5188 @Xxx20250 ‼️欺诈者TGID: 7847824155 7309790504 💸欺诈金额:2115.00u 🚫欺诈地址:— 📝 被骗说明:客户不接他结账 他老先生说没钱了,跑了 说话一套一套的 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 请注意防范,避免上当受骗! 遇到骗子点我 ✉️ @NBDAG_bot 提交举报! ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📱官方大群: @NBDAG688

12 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🚨 诈骗曝光 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 欺诈者昵称: 專業WhatsApp交易員 ✏️欺诈者账号: @Wsdong ‼️欺诈者TGID: 8526911583 💸欺诈金额:20.00U 🚫欺诈地址:TVrKV1HdDKPLLn7Hxr8N3TYmZZ4xUsbnSS 📝 被骗说明:骗子是个外国人,知道现在很多中国人需要WS蓝标账号,然后打着卖号的幌子行骗,刚开始说先付20U ,然后让你把号登录上,然后付余款,就想应该不会为了20U废了信誉吧,不过临打款时我还查了一下这个地址,确实有一条不良记录,只是诈骗别人的号,并没有涉及到到金额,所以打了20U,打完之后这骗子就不见了,许久才说要继续打钱还想诈骗,就当是买个教训了,所以这些外国人千万别和他们做生意,他们就是看准了中国人有钱会10U.20U 的打给他,还是要走海华担保,曝光这骗子,不要踩坑,和外国人交易千万谨慎,1U都会跑路 ━━━━━━━━━━━━📸 证据图片:7 张…

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @NBDAG888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“南部挡案馆(曝光) @NBDAG888” (@NBDAG888), 3,738 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NBDAG888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.