#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 源头-机器人开发|源码|网站|定制搭建二开 📢 kg集团 📢 七夜改文件官方🇨🇳《副频道》 📢 秋叶公益项目主频道 📢 贵阳 技师 📢 AJ文案社🏖头像馆🌈壁纸 📢 东南亚吃瓜群众 📢 迪迦拯救昆明市📸 📢 再见时难别亦难 📢 海棠会员通知区 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

Channel
马桶先生
@MrMaTong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,237subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001681663540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MrMaTong |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MrMaTong |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 1,237 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,235 | +9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 1,226 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,218 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 1,224 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 1,220 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.46%
- avg views ÷ 1,237 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30.4
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 213 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
又是羡慕精神小伙的一天!
全国直播行业遍地开花,感觉好多年轻小姑娘扎堆往里挤!真有这么多的榜一大哥吗???
#天津 #塘沽 塘沽第一次找打野战感觉被坑了? 今天没事点开小红书,看看附近的人,发现一个可能有故事的人,联系以后加Q,她给我发位置,我就过去了,看到人以后我直接就不开心了,带着口罩也能看出年龄不小了,身材都走样了,就这条件也敢开口要700?要7给5我感觉差不多,谁能想到来了个100的货。 我说你把口罩摘下来, 她告诉我有事可以说,这时他就开车门上车了,随后我也上车, 我说我只能给300, 他说这是最低价了,说好的价不能改,要不我也不能出来, 当时我就想,你这10年老夏利能和奔驰宝马比价格吗?但是我没好意思说,3000的我都玩过几次,我还差你这几百块钱吗?但是这钱花的心里不舒服! 随后他就说前面掉头,我告诉你怎么走! 考!这就开始了是吗?那就走吧来都来了!他给我指路开到一个停车场,过程不表,因为不爽!完事我问她你平时都怎么和其他人玩, 他来了句,我没地方,要么这个停车场,要么就…
95后演员蒋龙疑似新恋情曝光!深夜与神秘女子同车回小区,女方身份引爆全网猜测! 95后男演员蒋龙突然登上娱乐热搜!狗仔拍到他与张弛、张莉佳等人聚餐,散场后张弛先行离开,蒋龙则与一名女子同车返回小区,到达时已接近凌晨三点。 相关视频曝光后,部分网友认为女方是话剧演员张莉佳,也有人根据模糊侧脸和发型提出不同猜测,甚至将阮巨和陈思诚卷入讨论。不过画面中二人没有牵手、拥抱等明确亲密动作,当事人也尚未确认恋情。 一顿聚餐、一次同车回家,究竟是新恋情曝光,还是合作伙伴之间的正常往来? #张莉佳 #95后男演员 #蒋龙 #同车回小区 #蒋龙恋情 #神秘女子 #娱乐圈大瓜
渣男脚踏两只船,现场惨遭“清算”!两女生健身房堵门对质,连环大耳光打得啪啪作响! 近日,一段疑似发生在健身房休息区的情感纠纷视频在网络疯传。一名年轻男子被指同时交往两名女友,事情败露后,两位女生直接杀到健身房当面对质。 视频中,头戴蓝色棒球帽的女生情绪激动,先将杯中水泼向男子,随后连续扇出多记耳光,清脆的巴掌声响彻整个休息区。男子白色T恤被打湿,头发凌乱,全程表情慌张,几乎无法插话解释。 周围会员和工作人员集体围观,还有人举起手机拍摄记录。脚踏两只船是否属实尚待核实,但用暴力处理感情纠纷,同样可能承担相应的法律责任。 #连环耳光 #感情纠纷 #渣男翻车 #健身房抓包 #泼水现场 #两个女生堵门 #脚踏两只船
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @MrMaTong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,164,147 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pdsss · 54,075
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“马桶先生” (@MrMaTong), 1,237 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrMaTong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.