Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Moviezz Club Waiting Area

Channel

Moviezz Club Waiting Area

@Moviezzclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,912subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485135420
TypeChannel
Username@Moviezzclub
Created10 February 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Moviezzclub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9053,9353,9206 August 2026 — 3,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,935 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,930 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,925 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,926 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,923 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,917 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,906 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,905 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,911 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,912 subscribers3,9126 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,901–3,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:203,912+1
13 Sept 2026, 08:593,911+6
9 Sept 2026, 19:183,905-1
4 Sept 2026, 19:383,906-11
1 Sept 2026, 01:073,917-6
28 Aug 2026, 16:523,923-3
25 Aug 2026, 09:373,926+1
22 Aug 2026, 20:083,925-6
19 Aug 2026, 15:283,931-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:333,932+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:133,930-5
6 Aug 2026, 21:003,935no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:563,935first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 10 February 2021the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9634.4%
👎8430.1%
6523.3%
🥰217.53%
🔥51.79%
🤔51.79%
👏20.717%
😁10.358%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2021 to 5 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2024, 17:27 UTC≈28,900 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

21🥰21👍13👎10🤔5👏2

26 Jan 2022, 00:16 UTC≈61,500 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝙷𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚢 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌 𝙳𝚊𝚢 𝙱𝚘𝚢𝚜 😍😎🙂✌

👍25👎124🔥3

Signed ツ 🅴🅻🅴🆅🅴🅽 ツ

15 Jan 2022, 06:08 UTC≈58,400 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍11👎72

4 Nov 2021, 08:23 UTC≈61,300 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

18👍13👎9🔥1

Signed ツ 🅴🅻🅴🆅🅴🅽 ツ

4 Nov 2021, 08:22 UTC≈53,900 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Happy Diwali To All 🙂✨⚡

13👎11👍5

25 Jul 2021, 13:09 UTC≈72,800 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👎85👍5🔥1😁1

25 Jul 2021, 13:07 UTC≈64,800 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👀 hehe boi 😆😆 But don't worry will be deleted

👎27👍242

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Moviezzclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Moviezz Club Waiting Area” (@Moviezzclub), 3,912 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Moviezzclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.