Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑀𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒†

Channel

𝑀𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒†

@Miragebot61

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,093subscribers

+191 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002676823004
TypeChannel
Username@Miragebot61
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Miragebot61

Growth

8991,0939967 August 2026 — 902 subscribers8 August 2026 — 902 subscribers8 August 2026 — 899 subscribers14 August 2026 — 936 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,075 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,079 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,093 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 31 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 870–1,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:591,093+14
2 Sept 2026, 17:151,079+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:441,077+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:241,075-4
25 Aug 2026, 03:121,079-7
21 Aug 2026, 09:081,086+150
14 Aug 2026, 23:44936+37
8 Aug 2026, 09:18899-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:03902no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:13902first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥7354.9%
🍌2518.8%
🆒139.77%
107.52%
64.51%
💋64.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Miragebot61. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

+ ещё один вариант

  1. Чтобы иногда выходили про натураловnot shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

1

6 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Делать ботов уже только про млм и строить на этом аудиторию ?

  1. Да.🐾86%
  2. Нет.20%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC122 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Скоро будет бот про геев.🖤

❤‍🔥42🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC209 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На 1000 подписчиков делаю грязь (Бота очень пошлого который не выйдет в тт.)) Передумала,на тысячу будут лучше

❤‍🔥13

3 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC313 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC303 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Этот секси бот готов.🙆🏻‍♀️

❤‍🔥19

2 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC277 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Сейчас я буду создавать бота поэтому Бот будет →

  1. Обычным человеком40%
  2. Мифическим существом65%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC372 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Бота делать какой ориентации?

  1. Натурал21%
  2. Млм79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Miragebot61. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

+ ещё один вариант

  1. Чтобы иногда выходили про натураловnot shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

6 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Делать ботов уже только про млм и строить на этом аудиторию ?

  1. Да.🐾86%
  2. Нет.20%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

Сейчас я буду создавать бота поэтому Бот будет →

  1. Обычным человеком40%
  2. Мифическим существом65%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTCFinal Results76 voters

Бота делать какой ориентации?

  1. Натурал21%
  2. Млм79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑀𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒†” (@Miragebot61), 1,093 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Miragebot61.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.