Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mindshare

Channel

mindshare

@MindshareA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,398subscribers

+437 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002696457945
TypeChannel
Username@MindshareA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/MindshareA

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9471,4011,1747 August 2026 — 961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 961 subscribers15 August 2026 — 956 subscribers27 August 2026 — 953 subscribers4 September 2026 — 947 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,400 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,401 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,400 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,398 subscribers1,3987 August 20265 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 59 days, net +437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 879–1,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 14:161,398-2
27 Sept 2026, 20:541,400-1
15 Sept 2026, 23:381,401+1
12 Sept 2026, 02:371,400+453
4 Sept 2026, 07:00947-6
27 Aug 2026, 10:24953-3
15 Aug 2026, 06:44956-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:48961no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:09961first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15862.7%
🔥4919.4%
👍249.52%
👏93.57%
🥰93.57%
😁20.794%
👎10.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 02:54 UTC159 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

house music 400 mg of caffeine Locked in the trenches all day

👍5❤1

1 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC431 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Financial freedom isn’t a finish line; it’s a state of perpetual demand. Even when you’re resting, your mind is still operating, calculating the next level, protecting the net worth, and optimizing cash flow. The world sees the lifestyle, but nobody sees the invisible weight of keeping the machine running while trying to just be human

❤10

29 Apr 2026, 01:12 UTC716 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“If your capital base can sustain your lifestyle comfortably, you’re very rich”

👏6

25 Apr 2026, 17:27 UTC717 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Net worth signals position. Cash flow determines survival. Assets without income → create illusion. Income without structure → creates instability. So the risk isn’t the 7fig It’s the absence of liquidity and flow. Because when pressure comes: expenses remain → cash is required → assets may be illiquid. That’s where the “time bomb” sits. Wealth that cannot produce or convert on demand forces decisions at the wor…

❤1

25 Apr 2026, 17:20 UTC507 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Most people go broke counting the money they have while forgetting how much money they are making Read that again It’s not what you have it’s how much new money is coming in Cashflow >>> People in crypto go broke even after making a lot of money just by rising living standards

❤4👎1🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 16:54 UTC672 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Never in history have there been so many ways to generate money: • AI creating agents that work 24/7 // AI contents accounts • Creators monetizing global audiences • Crypto with markets open 24/7 // memecoins • Prediction markets like Polymarket paying for having good judgment • Trading, data, automation, content The "alpha" is everywhere. But a new bottleneck has emerged. Discipline. The problem is no longer acc…

❤12🔥1

19 Mar 2026, 15:32 UTC848 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰2😁2🔥1

16 Mar 2026, 18:21 UTC727 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Gen Z It can have two completely different sides: those who do nothing with their lives, just scrolling all day on TikTok and Instagram, like an NPC. And those who wake up and discover that our generation has the necessary tools to at least become a millionaire (with a net worth of $1 million). It's not easy, but it's not difficult either; just open your eyes.

❤10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MindshareA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mindshare” (@MindshareA), 1,398 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MindshareA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.