Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Служба MHS

Channel

Служба MHS

@Menshairstyling

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

22,629subscribers

+1,087 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001863178038
TypeChannel
Username@Menshairstyling
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Menshairstyling

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,40122,74122,0717 August 2026 — 21,542 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,542 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,553 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,695 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,740 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,683 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,652 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,639 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,624 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,602 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,563 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,457 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,418 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,413 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,408 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,401 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,650 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,741 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,726 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,657 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,650 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,692 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,730 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,642 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,625 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,613 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,552 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,529 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,476 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,621 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,629 subscribers22,6297 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,087. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,200–22,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:1822,629+8
16 Sept 2026, 12:4022,621+145
14 Sept 2026, 16:1722,476-53
13 Sept 2026, 04:5922,529-23
11 Sept 2026, 03:3622,552-61
8 Sept 2026, 06:4022,613-12
5 Sept 2026, 04:3722,625-17
3 Sept 2026, 10:0622,642-88
2 Sept 2026, 06:5222,730+38
1 Sept 2026, 05:1422,692+42
31 Aug 2026, 03:4222,650-7
30 Aug 2026, 00:1322,657-69
28 Aug 2026, 22:5722,726-15
27 Aug 2026, 22:5822,741+91
27 Aug 2026, 00:2722,650+1,249
25 Aug 2026, 22:2321,401-7
25 Aug 2026, 01:4621,408-5
23 Aug 2026, 16:3621,413-5
22 Aug 2026, 01:5721,418-39
20 Aug 2026, 22:3421,457first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 22,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,880
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held30 (19 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total14,411
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

845 reactions across 26 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35041.4%
🔥25730.4%
❤‍🔥526.15%
🤯495.80%
😇293.43%
182.13%
👀161.89%
💅161.89%
🍾111.30%
🫡91.07%
😱80.947%
🤩80.947%
🥰60.71%
👏50.592%
20.237%
🏆20.237%
👌20.237%
😘20.237%
👍10.118%
💯10.118%
1 further kind10.118%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 845 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Menshairstyling. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC681 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Продолжаем знакомиться с вами ❤️ Моя команда проведёт 10 кастдевов, чтобы глубже понять вас: ваши запросы, цели, что для вас важно в луксмаксинге и с какими вопросами вы сейчас приходите. Мне важно не просто рассказывать вам о своих подходах, а сначала лучше узнать вас и понять, что действительно актуально именно для вас. После записи на кастдев, некоторые из вас смогут получить полный разбор внешности бесплатно.

2 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTCviews —

Служба MHS pinned «Друзья. У меня появилось пару свободных мест на консультацию 👔👞🤵 ОТЗЫВЫ КЛИЕНТОВ Одноразовая консультация- 10,000₽= 7,000₽ Личное ведение (по луксмаксингу, питанию, тренировкам и улучшению стиля) 3 месяца- 30,000₽ = 15,000₽. ПИСАТЬ СЮДА @ValeriyFalinwork»

2 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,810 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Друзья. У меня появилось пару свободных мест на консультацию 👔👞🤵 ОТЗЫВЫ КЛИЕНТОВ Одноразовая консультация- 10,000₽= 7,000₽ Личное ведение (по луксмаксингу, питанию, тренировкам и улучшению стиля) 3 месяца- 30,000₽ = 15,000₽. ПИСАТЬ СЮДА @ValeriyFalinwork

🔥32👌2👀1

31 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,250 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ПРЯМЫЕ VS ВЬЮЩИЕСЯ ВОЛОСЫ На себе прям максимально вижу, почему кудри > прямые 😭 С кудрями лицо сразу выглядит фактурнее, черты становятся выразительнее, а внешка будто реально дороже. Особенно чёлка, она намного лучше подчеркивает скулы, челюсть и форму лица. Плюс волосы сами по себе добавляют объём, и весь образ выглядит интереснее. Прямые волосы норм, но лично мне с кудрями намного больше идёт… да и большинству

🔥95103

29 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈4,600 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Привет, впервые услышал о луксмаксинге год-полтора назад. Прежде я никогда особо не парился по поводу внешки, просто покупал что-то - лишь бы было (ну, думаю, как и большинство парней в снг). Соответственно, и выглядел не очень мягко говоря) Иногда экспериментировал со внешностью, например, стригся налысо и тогда даже не задумывался, как это тупо выглядело))) Начал луксмаксить свою внешность с того, что просто отрас

14💅4🔥3

29 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈4,070 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

УЧЕНИК МОГНУЛ УЧИТЕЛЯ?! Ну ахуеть результат, нет? Чел сначала не интересовался внешкой, потом узнал о луксмаксинге и начал ее потихоньку бустить. А по советам из моего тиктока и личной консультации закрыл все вопросы … И ВОТ ИТОГ!! А вы все думаете, что генетика виновата 😂 ➡️Записаться на консультацию сейчас можно с хорошей скидкой вот здесь: @ValeriyFalinwork А если не уверены, что она вам нужна, то начни с моег

🔥10💅3❤‍🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈8,900 views20 reactions11 Starsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Немного важных новостей 👀 Луксмаксинг продолжает набирать обороты, а теперь мы ещё и залетаем на Первый канал: рассказываю, что там готовится и почему это будет интересно. Плюс немного про наш бот @RateMHS_bot для разбора внешности: оценка лица, форма, подбор стрижки и дальнейшие планы по его развитию. Короче, есть что обсудить. Залетайте в голосовое – там всё самое интересное 🔥

17🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈8,100 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤯179👀6🏆2😱1

19 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈8,030 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вот это, пожалуй, одна из самых обсуждаемых трансформаций в зарубежном луксмаксинге. Это Брейден Питерс, он же Clavicular, один из самых известных западных looksmaxxing-инфлюенсеров. И самое интересное, он не ограничился обычным уходом за собой. Он экспериментировал с гормональными препаратами и другими веществами, снижением веса, уходом за кожей и различными методами изменения внешности. В 2026 году он также сдела

25

18 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈5,840 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

МЕНЯ ПРИГЛАСИЛИ НА ПЕРВЫЙ КАНАЛ. И мы будем говорить там про луксмаксинг. Если честно, для меня это до сих пор немного ебануто. Ещё год назад я рассказывал об этой теме в интернете, и для многих она была чем-то непонятным. А сейчас луксмаксинг обсуждают уже на телевидении. И я просто подумал: ахуеть. Мы это сделали. Я не говорю, что это только моя заслуга — есть ребята, которые тоже двигают эту тему. Но вместе мы

🔥9328🫡8🥰2💯1

12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈6,490 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

А вы все ещё думаете, что внешний вид ни на что не влияет?😅

36🔥1262

11 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈7,550 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

За последний месяц я провёл больше 100 разборов и консультаций. Разбирал лица, причёски, стиль, пропорции, давал советы — в общем, посмотрел на столько мужских лиц, что уже немного заебался 😄 Теперь еще бот @RateMHS_bot пашет вместе со мной 😂 Но вместе с этим я понял одну вещь: Луксмаксинг реально набирает обороты. Ещё недавно многие относились к этому как к чему-то странному из интернета. Сейчас всё больше парней

❤‍🔥138🔥4😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Menshairstyling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Menshairstyling edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Служба MHS” (@Menshairstyling), 22,629 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Menshairstyling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.