Video, posted without a caption
👍21

Channel
@Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,394subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001361336504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 2,394 | -3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 2,397 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 2,401 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,408 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 2,411 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 2,412 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 2,416 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 2,419 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 2,425 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 2,427 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 2,435 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 2,437 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 2,438 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 151 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2024 to 5 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
👍21
MEMBONGKAR KEDUSTAAN SYI’AH RAFIDHAH: SYAHADAT SUNNI DAN SYI’AH SAMA Sudah menjadi metode dakwah dan bagian dari keyakinan agama Syiah Rafidhah, bahwa mereka mewajibkan taqiyah—yakni menampakkan sesuatu yang bertentangan dengan keyakinan sebenarnya—dalam rangka menipu manusia demi mencapai tujuan mereka. Hal ini dijelaskan secara terang-terangan dalam kitab Ushul al-Kafi, salah satu kitab rujukan utama Syiah Rafid…
👍4
Video, posted without a caption
👍10
MENYINGKAP KEJAHATAN SEKTE SESAT SYIAH RAFIDHAH TERHADAP AISYAH SELAKU UMMUL MUKMININ SEKALIGUS ISTRI NABI (Bantahan terhadap Husein Shahab dan Jalaluddin Rachmat selaku dua pembesar syiah rafidhah Nusantara) Sudah terlalu banyak jika kita mau menunjukkan bukti-bukti dan dalil-dalil mengapa sekte syiah rafidhah disebut sebagai sekte yang sesat, menyesatkan, bahkan kafir. Hal ini membantah celotehan pembesar syiah …
👍7
BOLEHNYA MENTAHDZIR AHLI BID'AH DI MEDIA-MEDIA SOSIAL Pertanyaan diajukan ke Syaikh al-Allamah Shalih al-Fauzan hafizahullah Pertanyaan: ما حكم ذكر أهل البدع والتشهير بهم في مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي؟ "Apakah hukum menyebut ahli bid'ah dan membuat nama mereka dikenal di media-media sosial ?" Jawaban: نعم، لأجل التحذير منهم، طيب هذا، التشهير بهم لأجل التحذير منهم والإنكار عليهم، هذا شيء طيب، نعم "Ya, dalam rangk…
👍18
Video, posted without a caption
👍9
TAHDZIR AL-ALLAMAH SHALIH AL-FAUZAN HAFIZAHULLAH TERHADAP MUBTADI' KHURAFI HABIB ALI AL-JUFRI Pertanyaan: ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺘﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺠﻔﺮﻱ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ؟ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺳﻤﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺄﺳﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ، ﻓﺄﺭﺟﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻴﻨﻮﺍ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﺑﺘﻼﺀ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ "Apa pendapat anda tentang Habib (Ali) al-Jufri. Apakah dia termasuk dari kalangan ahlussunnah wal jama'ah. Dim…
👍9
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10
KESESATAN ULAMA KAUM SUFI HABIB ALI AL-JUFRI YANG TURUT MEMBERIKAN UCAPAN SELAMAT NATAL KEPADA KAUM NASRANI Natal merupakan salah satu perayaan yang didalamnya terdapat kekufuran. Dikarenakan mereka orang-orang Nasrani menganggap perayakan Natal tak lain sebagai hari kelahiran Tuhan. Hal ini sebagaimana yang dijelaskan langsung di situs resmi GKI (Gereja Kristen Indonesia). Dalam situs ini sangat gamblang dijelask…
👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
👍8
MEMBEDAH KESYIRIKAN DIBALIK PERAYAAN DAN UCAPAN SELAMAT NATAL Sebelum kita membahas hukum merayakan dan mengucapkan selamat natal yang banyak dilegalkan oleh sebagian orang yang ditokohkan baik yang mengaku sebagai Kiyai, Ustadz, Habib dan yang semisalnya. Mereka berdalih bahwa Yesus yang dimaksud kaum Nasrani (baca: kristen) pada hakekatnya adalah Nabi Isa alaihissalam itu sendiri. Sehingga tidak masalah bagi kaum…
👍8
Photo, posted without a caption
👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mengenal Manhaj Salaf” (@Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf), 2,394 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mengenal_Manhaj_Salaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.