๐ญ also if you got scammed, it's not my fault. because it's clearly not me.
Channel
๐ญ๐ณ๐ณ ๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ
@Memberss177
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
1,594subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001691980665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Memberss177 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Memberss177 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 1,594 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 1,596 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 1,595 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,596 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 1,599 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 1,601 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 18 June 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 32 | 43.2% | |
| ๐ | 12 | 16.2% | |
| ๐ | 12 | 16.2% | |
| โค | 9 | 12.2% | |
| ๐คฌ | 4 | 5.41% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.70% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.35% | |
| ๐ฑ | 1 | 1.35% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2024 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
this is not me, i never create new account with username feng again. I also no longer sell DDoS plans or service creation ddos methods
btw happy new year
โค4๐ฑ1
should we comeback ?
๐ฅ10๐5
Photo, posted without a caption
Just Want To Check If You All Still Online !
๐ฅ14โค3๐3
Hello Whats Upp !
๐9๐คฌ3๐ฅ2
wait for us India ๐ฎ๐ณ . We have a gift for you! don't forget to join our second channel where we will send the result of our leak: @Members177DataLeakks #177 Members
๐ฅ1
looks like Company Wom found a loophole where we attacked their website. now they are actively improving everything, but they forget that our request is bigger than just the thickness of their protection #177Members
โค1๐1
we will check the incoming report through this monitor. we will see if our attack makes a big impact or not. let's see the request and bypass from us #177Members
Hello Colombia Our attack this time targeted the Website Company Wom Colombia. We will hold back our attack for one day, our attack will attack and cause all services to the website to experience very serious problems. https://www.wom.co/ https://check-host.net/check-report/1aec83bdk753 https://check-host.net/check-report/1aec83bdk753 The evidence above is enough to prove our strength against the request we have. โฆ
๐1
Binternet Company Israel's website has been suspended due to receiving millions of requests within 1 day. This time we will target the Colombia website as our next target! #177Members
๐2๐ฅ1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Memberss177. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 622,581 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Memberss177 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ญ๐ณ๐ณ ๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บโ (@Memberss177), 1,594 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Memberss177.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.