Channel
@McDull_io
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,587subscribers
-246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002225875506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @McDull_io |
| Created | 21 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/McDull_io |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 28,587 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 28,635 | -40 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 28,675 | -26 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 28,701 | -45 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 28,746 | -28 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 28,774 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 28,797 | -36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 28,833 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 28,833 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 21 August 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
842 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 428 | 50.8% | |
| ❤ | 229 | 27.2% | |
| 👎 | 62 | 7.36% | |
| 🖕 | 39 | 4.63% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 2.85% | |
| 💩 | 19 | 2.26% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 2.14% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 0.713% | |
| 🤪 | 6 | 0.713% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.713% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 0.475% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.119% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 842reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2024 to 25 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨Bitmart listing🚨 🌟 Upcoming New Listing 🌟 🤩 #BitMart will list #MCDULL @McDull_IO soon! Keep an eye on our socials for further announcements. https://x.com/bitmartexchange/status/1861094715736686979?s=46
❤29🔥12👍6🥰6
McDull Community is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
❤4
Hey everyone, it's Georgina again ! One more time 🤫✅ If you haven't heard about MCDULL yet, you're missing out on the biggest crypto opportunity of the year ! 🚀 This little piggy is aiming for a whopping $1Billion market cap, and we're on a fast track to the moon! 🌕💸 MCDULL isn't just a meme coin – it's a revolution. ☄️ Georgina Rodriguez is bullish on $MCDULL 🚀 She's sharing her insights and support for US two time…
❤14👍9🔥8🐳1👏1
McDull Community is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
🔥 Stop everything ! Georgina just unleashed instagram story for $MCDULL! 🥶 We are buzzing and it's time to get in on the action. Don't miss out! 🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷 #MCDULL is aiming his death ray at the memeverse and is about to take the top spot for meme tokens. you can’t miss MCDULL. 🆒 👇 https://www.instagram.com/georginagio?igsh=MTByem15Yzh6cDJ0MA==
👍21
$McDull is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
👍6
🚀 $MCDULL IS LIVE! 🚀 🐷🤑 The meme token everyone’s been waiting for is officially here! 🎉 Contract Address: Buoj8HCZMnLRwzDmjzaswhkVhLZD58PG4pZ7rnYp6pCr Join the $MCDULL community and let’s take this to the moon together! 🌕🔥 Don’t miss out on the fun, rewards, and moonshots! 🚀💸 💬 Be part of the movement! #MCDULL #CryptoLaunch #MemeToken #BSC #CryptoCommunity Enjoy the launch!
❤15👍5🔥4
$McDull is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
👍38👏15❤1
Welcome to our community! 🎉 Ready to earn while having fun? Join the McDull Tap2Earn game on Telegram now, Tap, Invite friends and start collecting points today towards the airdrop! 🐽🐽 View Game
👍204❤166👎50🖕39💩7🤡6😡4👏2
$McDull is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
👍139👎12💩12🤪6
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @McDull_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 336,945 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“McDull portal” (@McDull_io), 28,587 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/McDull_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.