Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wizard

Channel

Wizard

@MagicFromWizard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,990subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221407908
TypeChannel
Username@MagicFromWizard
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MagicFromWizard

Growth

1,9831,9911,98710 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,991 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,990 subscribers1,99010 August 202624 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,982–1,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 12:341,990-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:351,991+6
17 Aug 2026, 10:251,985+2
13 Aug 2026, 15:581,983-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:211,985+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:451,984first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 1,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
628
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,885
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14258.9%
🔥4920.3%
😭177.05%
🐳104.15%
💊72.90%
👎62.49%
😁41.66%
🤔31.24%
🤬31.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MagicFromWizard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC178 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что ж, кажется эксперимент подошёл к концу. В общем я создал 28млн+ кланов. (изначально было 1.3млн) Теперь кланы создавать нельзя и скорее всего это именно из-за моего спама, но может быть так же и из-за неполадков. Короче, посмотрим что будет дальше. *Если это были просто неполадки, которые будут пофикшены в ближайшие часы, то этот пост будет удалён, а эксперимент продолжится.

👍3

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

2 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC799 views23 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026

Thanks for 50+ likes. File updated – no longer uses gg.searchNumber.

🔥19👍1👎1💊1🤬1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

1 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC908 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥4💊1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

23 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,630 views16 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

WZRD-TOOL(v1.1) Скачать: https://www.mediafire.com/file/luqa5ru1h3fkddo/WZRD-TOOL(v1.1).py/file Что нового? 1) Добавлены команды: 1. /w room <roomId or friends> – получение информации о комнате по ID или списка комнат, созданных друзьями (пароль и т.д.) в вашем регионе. 2. /w email <username> <password> – получение почты аккаунта. (Без аргументов выводит почту текущего аккаунта.) 3. /w clan crash <килобайты> – ус

👍10🐳3💊2🔥1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

23 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,420 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥7👍1💊1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

20 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,670 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

v1.1

🔥10🤔3🐳2💊1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

18 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,750 views69 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
File

Заметил ваши жалобы на Net Error Что нового? Добавлено изнасилование двух хостов, отвечающие за отправку читерских данных на сервер. (ir-sdk.dun.163, ir-sdk.dun.163yun) P.S: да, я мог и без поиска сделать, но мне лень. udp: если наберёте 50 лайков на этом посте, то сделаю без поиска.

👍64👎2🤬2💊1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

11 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC≈2,300 views4 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

https://youtu.be/6-v-ybF9q8I?si=88ZGVtEZnGJng84X Что доступно: 1) Взлом рамок (можно поставить абсолютно любую и она будет видна ИМЕННО В ИГРЕ, но не в меню) 2) Скрытый магазин игр 3) Установка даты рождения любой 4) Установка GIF аватарок 5) Нелегальные аватарки: /w pic http://staticgs.sandboxol.com/editorfile/editor/file/6c1729bc78a2eafb69eef4f1af6124c3/cdlmsruppr.1658217604151.zip С помощью этой команды вы сможе

🔥4

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

9 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC≈2,020 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Они такие вкусненькие, правда же?

😭17👍4😁3🐳2

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

8 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,030 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026

wzrd-tool v1.0 будет слит в течение трёх дней

👍21

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

5 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC≈2,290 views6 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Я заметил, что некоторые товарищи мне пишут в лс про панель, типа: "ыыы прогнулся под них", "ыыы обнови панель". Говорю сразу — я не прогнулся под них и обновлять не буду, даже не надейтесь. Эту панель я слепил ногами за пару часов (там даже написано "by wizard feet") исключительно ради того, чтобы мод не выглядел как днище ебанное, а не потому что мне это в кайф. Я ещё с 2023 года забросил это дело, потому что это н

👍5🔥1

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

4 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC≈2,130 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

mod wzrd + base panel by wizard feet (eng ver 10114) tutor: https://youtu.be/s6uKe92UyFI?si=ifx2TDE-PEu0nZO0

👍7🔥2

Signed 𝙫𝙨𝙚.𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞.𝙬𝙞𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MagicFromWizard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll329 voters
  1. WZRD-TOOL v1.043%
  2. Magic Client v1.3.357%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,955 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wizard” (@MagicFromWizard), 1,990 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MagicFromWizard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.