5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,225–1,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 03:56
1,230
-13
2 Sept 2026, 19:34
1,243
-12
27 Aug 2026, 19:24
1,255
-7
24 Aug 2026, 13:52
1,262
-4
23 Aug 2026, 05:45
1,266
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.9%
avg views ÷ 1,230 subscribers
Avg views / post
847
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
19 (25 July 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
5,930
Reactions total
197
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
599 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
252
42.1%
❤
207
34.6%
🕊
74
12.4%
👍
38
6.34%
✍
18
3.01%
💔
10
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MadcapWrites. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
《کلئوپاترا؛ میراثی از خون و امپراتوری: بخش نخست》
پس از فتحِ مصر به دست "اسکندر مقدونی" در سال ۳۳۲ پیش از میلاد و انهدام شاهنشاهی هخامنشی، قلمرو مصر به امپراتوری مقدونی ضمیمه گردید. با مرگِ نابهنگامِ اسکندر در سال ۳۲۳ پ.م. و عدم معرفی جانشینی معیّن، سردارانِ لشکرش قلمروی فتحشده را فیمابین خود تقسیم نمودند. در این تقسیمبندی، "بطلمیوس بن لاگوس"، یکی از فرماندهانِ ارشدِ اسکندر، مصر را به چنگ آورد و دودمانِ بطلیمو…
"کنون آفرین جهانآفرین
بخوانیم بر شهریار زمین
ابوالقاسم آن شاه خورشید چهر
بیاراست گیتی به داد و به مهر
نجوید جز از خوبی و راستی
نیارد بداد اندرون کاستی
جهان روشن از تاج محمود باد
همه روزگارانش مسعود باد
همیشه جوان تا جوانی بود
همان زنده تا زندگانی بود
چه گفت آن سراینده دهقان پیر
ز گشتاسپ وز نامدار اردشیر
وزان نامداران پاکیزهرای
ز داراب وز رسم و رای همای
چو دارا به تخت مهی برنشست
کمر بر میان بست و بگشاد دست
چ…
"...از همان کودکی عادتش شده بود؛ شبها قبلِ خواب رویا میبافت. اینگونه راحتتر هم به خواب میرفت. نصفهشبها هم از خواب میپرید تا رویای نیمهکارهاش را ببافد. شال گردنِ رویاهایش این شبها، طناب دار میشد و به گلویش میفشرد.
صداها نمیگذاشتند با تمرکز رویا ببافد. به خود نهیب میزد که بخواب. چیزی نیست دختر! بخواب! سپس صدایی از درون فرمان میداد که: بیدار شو! همهاش یک کابوس است! بیدار شو!
بیدار ماند. کل آن روزها را …
مسئلهای که خیلی از آدمها با آن روبهرو هستند این است که برای حفظ رابطههایی که برایشان مهم است، تا چه اندازه ناچارند بخشهایی از خودشان را نادیده بگیرند.
این یک مسئلهی فرهنگی است و فروید هم دقیقاً از همین حرف میزند: بخشهای بزرگی از وجود ما در قالبهای موجود جا نمیگیرند و باید قالبهای تازهای برایشان پیدا شود.
ما میتوانیم با آنچه هست سازگار شویم و به آن تن بدهیم، یا میتوانیم آن را به چالش بکشیم.
#@ahura_pu…
《بازنگریای بر مفهوم زیبایی》
زیبایی یک مفهوم "گشتالتی" است و از همین روست که نادر است. زیبایی، مجموع چند عنصر قشنگ کنار هم نیست، ظاهر و کلام صرف نیست، استحقاق و جایگاه منفرد نیست؛ حتی مجموع و یکایک اینها نیز نمیتواند آدمی را بهقدر کافی زیبا گرداند. پس به راستی زیبایی چیست؟
زیبایی یک "کُل" است. یک کُل واحد و یکپارچه که فراتر از مجموع اجزاست، فراتر از مجموعِ اجزای قشنگ و نیکصورت و نیکسیرت که چه به تنهایی و چه ب…
《سالومه و یحیی؛ رقصی که به قیمت جان پیامبر تمام شد.》
ماجرای اعدام "یحیی تعمیددهنده"، یکی از تلخترین روایتهای سنتِ یهودی-مسیحی است که در دل خود، آمیزهای از سیاست، کینهورزی خانوادگی و تقدس را جای داده است. بر اساس روایتهای انجیلیِ سدهٔ نخست میلادی، یحیی، ازدواجِ "هیرودیس آنتیپاس"، فرمانروای جلیل، را با "هیرودیا" بهشدت محکوم کرد؛ چراکه هیرودیا قبلاً همسرِ "فیلیپ"، برادرِ هیرودیس، بود. همین محکومیتِ صریح بود ک…
《نیمدانش، بلای جانِ آگاهی!》
کسانی که از هر شاخه دانش تنها چند برگ میچینند، اغلب گمان میبرند که از همه چیز آگاهترند. غافل از اینکه ناقصدانی، خود آفتِ فهم درست است. ذهنِ ناآشنا به ژرفای یک علم، هرگز به درستیِ آن دست نمییابد و ناگزیر به برداشتهای نادرست و تحلیلهای لغزان دامن میزند.
چنین افرادی، با کولهباری از خودبزرگبینی، به خود اجازه میدهند که بر دیگران خرده بگیرند. در عین حال، هر روز بیش از پیش در گردا…
از دست دادنِ همیشگی آنها که تا همین دیروز به نام یا به کامت بودهاند قصّهای دیگر است، امّا آیا تا به حال آنانی را از دست دادهای که هیچگاه حتی به دستشان هم نیاورده بودی؟
آدمی در این نقطه نمیداند باید دلتنگ باشد یا دلچرکین، نمیداند غصهی آن روزهایی را بخورد که هرگز جز در خیال او واقع نیامدند یا غصه روزهای بعدی را که دیگر حتّی همان نخِ پوسیده و اتصالِ نصفهنیمه هم وجود ندارد.
شاید نیازی نباشد دیگری را داشت تا…
در دلِ خاکستری که از تنِ سوخته ما برجای مانده، نه عطر، که دود را به سینه میکشیم و هر روز، چون چرخِ ماشینی بیجان، یک الگوریتمِ خاموش را تکرار میکنیم، بیهیچ، تهی، پوچ، چون پژواکی در چاه؛ و من در انتهای این افقِ بسته، چشم به روزنهای دوختهام، شاید رهایی باشد، شاید فریب، شاید آن سوی دیوار هم هیچچیز جز دروغی دیگر نباشد، اما من همچنان، به امیدِ خود، دروغ میگویم.
-Progressive Rock٫ Doom Metal
-MadcapWrites
اگه میتونستید با ۳تا از شخصیتهای تاریخی/مشاهیر ملاقات کنید، اون ۳ نفر کیا بودن؟
❤🔥7❤3✍1
Signed ᴍᴀᴅᴄᴀᴘ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MadcapWrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BARFAK | برفک @barfakofficial · 56,754 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"مَدکَپتوپیا | MadcapTopia"” (@MadcapWrites), 1,230 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MadcapWrites.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
