Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 58 days, net +311. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,969–28,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 15:56
28,377
-151
26 Sept 2026, 14:37
28,528
-109
19 Sept 2026, 13:41
28,637
+10
15 Sept 2026, 00:59
28,627
-28
13 Sept 2026, 07:41
28,655
-26
11 Sept 2026, 12:38
28,681
-21
8 Sept 2026, 19:20
28,702
-10
5 Sept 2026, 09:38
28,712
+24
3 Sept 2026, 10:08
28,688
+61
2 Sept 2026, 07:44
28,627
+156
1 Sept 2026, 09:54
28,471
+111
31 Aug 2026, 09:54
28,360
+29
30 Aug 2026, 12:35
28,331
+2
29 Aug 2026, 15:26
28,329
+12
28 Aug 2026, 13:36
28,317
+30
27 Aug 2026, 14:24
28,287
+23
26 Aug 2026, 14:16
28,264
+33
25 Aug 2026, 14:18
28,231
+14
24 Aug 2026, 12:33
28,217
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:33
28,218
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 28,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,310
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
60 (8 June 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
109,610
Reactions total
2,060
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
85
Videos
2
Links
69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
10,733 reactions across 60 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,351
59.2%
👍
2,473
23.0%
🔥
1,112
10.4%
👏
137
1.28%
😱
114
1.06%
🗿
104
0.969%
🎉
103
0.96%
😐
95
0.885%
🥰
49
0.457%
😎
33
0.307%
🤩
21
0.196%
❤🔥
19
0.177%
🤝
18
0.168%
🕊
16
0.149%
🫡
16
0.149%
🙏
15
0.14%
✍
11
0.102%
🍾
10
0.093%
🆒
7
0.065%
💘
7
0.065%
9 further kinds
22
0.205%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The next stage of Mirex KYC is getting closer. 🔐
Our upcoming Spin & Win feature is connected to the rollout of KYC within the Mirex app.
Through Spin & Win, community members will have the opportunity to secure one of the first KYC testing slots.
This staged approach allows us to test the full verification process with an initial group before expanding access across the wider Mirex community.
We know KYC is one of…
SOMETHING NEW IS COMING TO MIREX. 👀🔥
We've been working behind the scenes on the next addition to the Mirex experience.
A new feature.
A new way to engage.
Another piece of the ecosystem coming to life. ⚡
We're not revealing everything just yet.
Coming soon. Stay tuned. 🚀
#MirexNetwork #Futurefinance
Could RWA funding be more engaging? 🎮🌐
RWA can be complex. Understanding it shouldn’t be.
Imagine discovering tokenised assets through an interactive experience:
Discover → Explore → Learn → Participate 🔗
Mirex is building an ecosystem designed to make RWA tokenisation more accessible, intuitive, and easier to navigate.
Because adoption isn’t only about infrastructure.
It’s about creating experiences people can…
WHAT MAKES AN RWA ECOSYSTEM ACTUALLY USEFUL? 🌐
Tokenizing an asset is only the beginning.
A real ecosystem needs three things working together:
⚙️ Infrastructure - the foundation
🔗 Utility - giving the ecosystem purpose
👥 Community - bringing it to life
At Mirex, we’re building these pieces together, creating the infrastructure for real-world assets to move on-chain, develop real utility, and open new oppo…
HOW DOES TOKENISATION ACTUALLY WORK? 🌐
A real-world asset starts off-chain. Tokenisation creates a digital representation of that asset on blockchain infrastructure. 🔗
Physical Asset → Legal Structure → Token → On-chain Representation
But the technology is only part of the story.
Bringing assets on-chain can create new possibilities for ownership, access, liquidity and participation — making opportunities that ha…
RWA SHOULDN’T FEEL IMPOSSIBLE. 🌐
Tokenization can involve complex technology, financial structures and blockchain infrastructure.
But for the people using it, the experience shouldn’t have to feel complex.
Complex infrastructure → Simple experience. ⚡
At Mirex, we’re building towards an ecosystem that makes tokenized real-world assets and investment opportunities easier to discover, understand and participate in.…
🏗️ HOW DOES RWA FUNDING ACTUALLY WORK?
It sounds complex, but the concept is simple:
Asset → Structure → Funding → Participation 🔗
A real-world asset or business is identified, the legal and financial structure is established, and capital is raised through a tokenised offering.
Participants can then gain access to clearly defined rights linked to that asset or opportunity.
That’s where tokenisation opens new pos…
THE NEXT CHAPTER. 🚀
MRX TGE marked an important milestone. But the launch was never the finish line.
Our focus now is on building out the wider Mirex ecosystem.
Expanding our blockchain infrastructure, developing real-world asset tokenisation and creating new opportunities for our global community. 🌍
Every stage builds towards a bigger vision: connecting real-world assets, blockchain technology and community part…
⛏️ 5× LUMIRA MINING BOOSTER IS LIVE! 🚀
This weekend, boost your mining rewards with 5× mining power!
Open the Mirex app, activate your mining session and make the most of this weekend’s boost.
Your next mining session is waiting. 🟢
Start mining now!
#Lumira #MirexNetwork
⚠️ Temporary Service Interruption
OVHcloud is currently carrying out planned database maintenance, which is temporarily affecting Mirex Network services.
Our services will be back online as soon as the maintenance is complete.
Thank you for your patience and understanding! 💚
🔗 OVHcloud maintenance status: [https://web-cloud.status-ovhcloud.com/incidents/cbmfpt5wk644](https://web-cloud.status-ovhcloud.com/incident…
Mirex is now officially verified on BscScan! ✅
Verification processes take time, especially for newly deployed tokens, but we’re pleased to confirm that Mirex has now successfully completed this important step.
What does this mean for MRX?
• The previous “Suspicious” label has been fully removed.
• Our company information has been verified on-chain, providing greater transparency around the project.
• We have su…
🌐 FROM REAL WORLD → ON-CHAIN
Crypto is only one part of the bigger shift.
The real opportunity is how assets move.
Asset → Tokenization → Blockchain → Utility 🔗
Tokenization brings real-world assets on-chain, creating new possibilities for ownership, liquidity, settlement and global access. 🌍
At Mirex, we’re building towards an ecosystem where real-world assets can be tokenized, accessed and used on-chain, with o…
❤69👍22🔥11👏8😐4🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @MIRANetworkHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👀 Is it time we lock the MRX liquidity pool? 🔒
#MirexNetwork
🔒 YES. LOCK IT.67%
👀 NOT YET.33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mirex Network Channel” (@MIRANetworkHub), 28,377 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MIRANetworkHub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.