Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Древняя Луна

Channel

Древняя Луна

@Luna_ancient

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,878subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673420149
TypeChannel
Username@Luna_ancient
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Luna_ancient

Growth

1,8781,9141,8967 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,907 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,887 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,878 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,873–1,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 16:541,878-9
23 Aug 2026, 23:031,887-8
20 Aug 2026, 15:441,895-6
17 Aug 2026, 19:161,901-6
14 Aug 2026, 14:371,907-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:471,909-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:321,912-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:311,914no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:221,914first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.97%
avg views ÷ 1,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (27 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,682
Reactions total313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

490 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523784243285854352223147.1%
custom 545206162332793450113427.3%
custom 529887636197109869012525.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 490reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC65 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нет, не как Уэйта. Я приходила к своим трактовкам через виделку и интуитивно, из опыта в раскладах. Мне не подошла ни одна трактовка, которая писалась в общественном доступе.

custom 52378424328585435229custom 52988763619710986904custom 54520616233279345014

7 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC87 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, мы сегодня стали ближе Попадание 10/10

custom 52378424328585435226custom 52988763619710986904custom 54520616233279345014

7 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC86 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По ведической, я выделил несколько моментиков: Солнце, и Луна находятся в Пурва Бхадрападе. Это тоже отчасти один из очень редких накшатр в ведической системе. Он управляется божеством Аджа Экапада, которого переводит как «Одноногий». Это божество , которое стоит одной ногой в материальном мире, а другой мире духовном. Поэтому думаю это одна из причин твоей сильной тяги и связи с духовным/оккультизмом. Обычно у люде

custom 52378424328585435227custom 54520616233279345014custom 52988763619710986903

7 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC77 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52378424328585435225custom 52988763619710986905custom 54520616233279345015

7 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC82 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще первое,что я заметил это Соединение Солнца и Луны, такое сочтения называют личностью Новолуния, это говорит о том, что энергия направлена не на внешнее, а на внутреннее, что в глазах у людей может восприниматься как эгоизм или себе на уме. А также мир воспринимаешь через личный опыт и переживания, а не потому что-то кто-то что-то там сказал но чувства могут быть сильными, что может влиять на принятие решений и

custom 52378424328585435228custom 52988763619710986905custom 54520616233279345015

7 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC80 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

марс в овне все понятно поэтому нахуй послать как в магазин сходить

custom 52378424328585435227custom 52988763619710986905custom 54520616233279345015

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC98 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Часто сталкиваюсь с удивлением, когда узнают что я водная, хотя по вайбам я больше огненная (по наблюдениям и словам людей) а в жизни, по поведению и действиям я очень земная 👀

custom 52378424328585435229custom 52988763619710986905custom 54520616233279345015

7 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC99 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте! Только я и бог знает, как часто мне задают этот вопрос не только люди из аудитории, которая за мной следит, но в целом знакомые коллеги ххпхпхпхпххп Факт обо мне: я ничего не понимаю в астрологии. Я специализируюсь именно в планетарной магии, но натальная карта для меня неизученный объект. Хотите, смотрите сами ахахахахахах

custom 52378424328585435228custom 54520616233279345015custom 52988763619710986904

5 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC132 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Единственный культ, в котором я согласна участвовать:

custom 523784243285854352210custom 52988763619710986906custom 54520616233279345015

5 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC135 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня крайне смешанные чувства, касательно всего, что происходит вокруг культа великой матери. С одной стороны я рада что люди тянутся к проявлениям, которые способны на них влиять благоприятно (вспомним мою агрессивную позицию к кладбищенской магии и какой вред это приносит в руках неопытных), но сейчас происходит угнетение образа мужских богов и «великого отца» на фоне матери, особенно когда это объясняется личны

custom 529887636197109869014custom 523784243285854352210custom 54520616233279345017

5 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC116 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нравится заходить в тик ток и читать комментарии на примере этого, а иногда «ура ты снова в реках» пхахаха приятно Касательно великой матери и культа…

custom 523784243285854352217custom 52988763619710986908custom 54520616233279345018

3 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC148 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Это я еще не трогаю тот факт, что не в каждой той же современный традиции есть адекватный по факту представитель божества/духа и подобного. Иногда это просто кружок рукоделия по интересам, без подкрепленной практики с результатами. В наше время это чаще всего лишь маленькое наследие, что смогли сохранить и уже свое докрутили, выдвигая без альтернативы по своим личным условиям и для своих личных целей.

custom 523784243285854352214custom 54520616233279345018custom 52988763619710986906

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Luna_ancient. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 878,889 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Древняя Луна” (@Luna_ancient), 1,878 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Luna_ancient.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.