Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LunarisSec πŸ‡©πŸ‡Ώ

Channel

LunarisSec πŸ‡©πŸ‡Ώ

@Lun4risSec

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

1,354subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003733257070
TypeChannel
Username@Lun4risSec
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 25 May 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lun4risSec

Topic

Hacking & security β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2431,3541,298.57 August 2026 β€” 1,243 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,243 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,245 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,252 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 1,255 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,268 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,280 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 1,291 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 1,294 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 1,304 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 1,308 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 1,316 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 1,317 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 1,313 subscribers26 September 2026 β€” 1,323 subscribers5 October 2026 β€” 1,320 subscribers11 October 2026 β€” 1,354 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 64 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,226–1,371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 00:211,354+34
5 Oct 2026, 04:571,320-3
26 Sept 2026, 12:191,323+10
15 Sept 2026, 18:581,313-4
11 Sept 2026, 18:581,317+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:401,316+8
2 Sept 2026, 10:491,308+4
30 Aug 2026, 14:231,304+10
27 Aug 2026, 10:251,294+3
24 Aug 2026, 11:031,291+11
20 Aug 2026, 20:221,280+12
17 Aug 2026, 19:181,268+13
15 Aug 2026, 02:471,255+3
11 Aug 2026, 18:521,252+7
8 Aug 2026, 14:351,245+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:011,243no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:341,243first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

264 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀15558.7%
πŸ”₯2810.6%
πŸ‘238.71%
πŸ₯°238.71%
πŸ‘134.92%
😁72.65%
❀‍πŸ”₯62.27%
🫑41.52%
🀝31.14%
β˜ƒ20.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC345 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

STOP YOUR CHAT CONTROL πŸ–•πŸ€£ #DIGITAL_FREEDOM_LUNARISSEC

πŸ”₯6🀝3

3 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC358 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί Wake up, wake up, seriously... make an effort! And you want to impose "Chat Control"? That's pretty ironic when your own systems still have security flaws like this. We're warning you once again: stop your "Chat Control" project. You may think you're winning, but don't forget that there will always be another vulnerability, you may win a point, sure, but not the war. Why push for "Chat Control" when the world is…

❀8🫑4πŸ”₯1

1 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC476 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

STOP YOUR CHAT CONTROL πŸ–•πŸ€£ #DIGITAL_FREEDOM_LUNARISSEC

πŸ‘8

1 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC478 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί Another vulnerability… Seriously, make an effort! And you want to impose "Chat Control"? That's pretty ironic when your own systems still have security flaws like this. We're warning you once again: stop your "Chat Control" project. You may think you're winning, but don't forget that there will always be another vulnerability, you may win a point, sure, but not the war. Why push for "Chat Control" when the world…

❀10😁2

29 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC555 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

STOP YOUR CHAT CONTROL πŸ–•πŸ€£ #DIGITAL_FREEDOM_LUNARISSEC

πŸ₯°6πŸ”₯4πŸ‘3

29 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC560 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί Another vulnerability… Seriously, make an effort! And you want to impose "Chat Control"? That's pretty ironic when your own systems still have security flaws like this. We're warning you once again: stop your "Chat Control" project. You may think you're winning, but don't forget that there will always be another vulnerability, you may win a point, sure, but not the war. Why push for "Chat Control" when the world…

❀10πŸ”₯4

28 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC570 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

STOP YOUR CHAT CONTROL πŸ–• #DIGITAL_FREEDOM_LUNARISSEC

❀13

28 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC581 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If I understand correctly, you want to impose "Chat Control" while your own systems are poorly secured, the whole world is laughing. The whole world does not want your flawed system. We stand for digital freedom. Say no to Chat Control, we want digital freedom, privacy. Why push for "Chat Control" when the world is already facing constant cyberattacks from hackers, a poorly designed system will only weaken securi…

❀17πŸ”₯4πŸ‘2πŸ‘2

27 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC563 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Be aware that we have already identified the vulnerabilities in your systems. Your technological arrogance will be your downfall. Every measure you adopt to control us strengthens our determination to resist you πŸ–• #DIGITAL_FREEDOM_LUNARISSEC

πŸ₯°16❀2πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

27 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC559 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί We are LunarisSec, we issue an ultimatum regarding your mass surveillance project known as "Chat Control" We will not remain silent in the face of this unacceptable attack on our fundamental freedoms. Our demands are as follows: 1 - Immediate and definitive abandonment of the Chat Control project in both its 1.0 and 2.0 versions 2 - Constitutional protection of end-to-end encryption throughout the European Union…

❀10πŸ”₯8πŸ‘3πŸ‘1

24 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC793 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡«πŸ‡· A minor issue related to WhatsApp, we would like to clarify that no user data will be compromised or leaked. Our goal is to raise awareness about the risks that exist online, to remind people that no system is completely secure, and to highlight that protecting privacy remains a major challenge We are LunarisSec. Time destroys everything it creates. We don't break the rules, we rewrite them. Expect LunarisSec. […

❀11πŸ‘1

13 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC857 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‡«πŸ‡· The official website of franceparebrise.fr had a critical security flaw, and we reported it. France is the country most affected by cyberattacks, so we are going to do something to help this country. We are LunarisSec. Time destroys everything it creates. We don't break the rules, we rewrite them. Expect LunarisSec. [+] LunarisSec X : https://x.com/cyb_r21643/status/2076669624238694846 #LunarisSec #Algeria #Mis…

❀8πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Lun4risSec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œLunarisSec πŸ‡©πŸ‡Ώβ€ (@Lun4risSec), 1,354 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lun4risSec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.