4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,392–7,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 11:32
7,412
+16
8 Aug 2026, 02:07
7,396
+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:16
7,395
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:07
7,395
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 7,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
46 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
76,760
Reactions total
2,308
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,350
Videos
≈1
Links
≈412
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,308 reactions across 46 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,308
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#BTC
* 후속브리핑
결국 튀어오르면 봐야 하는 구간이라고 표기 드렸던 저항인 '64.4K ~ 64.5K' 에서 저항을 받고 단기적으로 크게 밀리고 있습니다.
그리고 반등 추세 유지 핵심 구역을 이탈 했습니다. 따라서 순조로운 반등 추세는 종료 되었습니다.
이제부터 핵심은 전일 반등을 만들었던 4시간봉 지지 구간 '63.3K ~ 63.6K' 수성 여부입니다.
이탈 시 '62.5K ~ 62.7K' 까지 열리게 되므로 매우매우 메이저한 구간입니다.
"즉 현 구간은 승부처란 얘기입니다."
라이브에서 다시 롱을 시도 했는데 어제 처럼 63.1K에 스탑로스 잡아두고 지켜보겠습니다.
*본 컨텐츠는 개인적인 매매 전략 입니다. 절대로 따라하지 않아야 하며 투자의 모든 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
#BTC #15분봉
* 후속브리핑
CPI 발표전 반등이 먼저 나오고 있으며 금일 첫 브리핑에서 말씀드린 단기 구조에서의 저항 구간인 '63.8K ~ 63.9K' 를 돌파 시도 중입니다.
발표 전 물량을 줄이지 않았다면 현 저항 구간에서 심리적 안정감을 위해 약간의 익절 정도는 가져가는 게 좋다고 생각합니다.
발표 이후에 변동성이 심해지겠지만 여튼 차트 상으로는 현 구간을 지지 구간으로 전환 시킨다면 다음 저항인 '64.1K ~ 64.2K' 까지 열리는 구조입니다.
제 개인매매는 롱 포지션 홀딩 중이며 CPI 발표 전 '64.1K ~ 64.2K'에 도달한다면 물량 덜어내겠습니다.
*본 컨텐츠는 개인적인 매매 전략 입니다. 절대로 따라하지 않아야 하며 투자의 모든 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
- 주요 기관들의 CPI 예측
예상치 대비 YOY(전년 대비) 물가는 하락할 것으로 예측하고 있지만 MOM(전월 대비) 는 상승할 것으로 예측 중입니다.
이대로 나올 경우 시장은 혼조세를 보일 가능성이 높습니다.
"한마디로 예측하기 힘들다는 뜻이죠."
이 경우 세부지표 등 해석에 달렸습니다.
단순히 YOY 예상치를 하회한 것을 보고 좋아할 것이냐 전월 대비 물가가 올라왔기 때문에 금리 인상 공포가 다시 엄습할 것이냐
예측보다는 대응이 중요한 CPI 발표가 되겠네요
*본 컨텐츠는 개인적인 매매 전략 입니다. 절대로 따라하지 않아야 하며 투자의 모든 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
#BTC #4시간봉
링앺눈입니다 :)
새벽간 지지 구간인 '63.3K ~ 63.6K' 를 깊숙히 찌르는 움직임이 있었지만 종가로 지켜내며 소폭 반등 중입니다.
햔 구간 이탈이 없을 경우 조금 더 반등이 가능하다는 관점으로 접근하겠습니다.
하지만 금일은 CPI가 있기 때문에 변동성에 대비하여 수익이 크지는 않지만 물량을 줄이는 선택을 하는 것이 좋다고 생각하여 저는 약간의 수익으로 물량을 줄이겠습니다.
초 단기적으로 15분봉상 '63.8K ~63.9K' 가 저항으로 작용하고 있습니다.
조금 더 반등하기 위해 돌파해야 하는 구간으로 설정하여 대응 하시길 바랍니다!
*본 컨텐츠는 개인적인 매매 전략 입니다. 절대로 따라하지 않아야 하며 투자의 모든 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
#BTC #4시간봉
* 후속브리핑
결국 추가 하락이 있었고 중간 단위의 매물대는 제 역할을 하지 못 해 폐기합니다.
그리고 언급드린 지지 구간인 '63.3K ~ 63.6'K' 에 왔기 때문에 할 일이 생겼고 저는 해당 구간에서 롱을 진입했습니다.
이제 여기서 지키느냐 못 지키느냐의 싸움이며 이탈 시 손절 하는 대응을 하겠습니다.
지지 구간 최 하단부 63.3K 에 추가 오더를 걸어뒀고 손절은 63.1K로 맞춰 두겠습니다.
마지막으로 절반 익절하고 남은 숏은 추가로 익절한 상태입니다.
다들 좋은 대응 하시길 바랍니다.
*본 컨텐츠는 개인적인 매매 전략 입니다. 절대로 따라하지 않아야 하며 투자의 모든 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
❤64
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @LincolnTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 990,681 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“링컨 트레이딩(Lincoln Trading)” (@LincolnTrading), 7,412 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LincolnTrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.