Channel
@Liberion_Channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,794subscribers
-213 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001825892229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Liberion_Channel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Liberion_Channel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 2,794 | -19 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 2,813 | -55 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 2,868 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 2,879 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 2,892 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:49 | 2,917 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 2,929 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 2,946 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 2,955 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 2,968 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,974 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 2,989 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 3,001 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 3,005 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 3,007 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 3,007 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👌 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ON-CHAIN VS OFF-CHAIN: WHAT ACTUALLY GOES ON THE BLOCKCHAIN? Putting digital identity on blockchain does not mean putting your personal data there. Liberion separates verifiable trust anchors from sensitive identity data. ON-CHAIN 🔹 Hashes 🔹 Timestamps 🔹 S-NFT Passport events 🔹 Attestation event anchors 🔹 Consent / revocation event anchors OFF-CHAIN 🔐 Documents 🔐 Photographs 🔐 Personal data 🔐 Sensitive files Why…
Share Proof, Not Raw Data Why send a full document when a service only needs one fact? To confirm that someone is 18+, a platform may not need a passport scan, date of birth, nationality, document number, and photo. It may only need the answer: 18+ — YES. Liberion is designed around that principle. A supported service can request a specific proof or agreed attribute. The holder approves the request, and the ser…
One Passport. Updatable Proof. Traditional identity verification creates a snapshot. But identity does not stay frozen. Documents expire. Roles change. Verification statuses can be updated. New credentials can be added. Liberion's S-NFT Passport is designed around that reality. The passport can accumulate attributes, roles, and attestations from trusted verifiers, including: - verification status - 18+ or anoth…
Proof of Humanity ≠ Proof of Identity They sound similar, but they answer different questions. Proof of Humanity (PoH) confirms a unique living person. Proof of Identity (PoI) connects that person to verified identity evidence. Why does the distinction matter? Sometimes a service only needs proof that there is a real human behind an account. In other situations, verified identity is required. Liberion combines bo…
An S-NFT Passport Is Not a Collectible Seeing “NFT” in the name can create the wrong expectation. Liberion’s S-NFT Passport is not designed for trading or transfer. It is a soulbound, non-transferable identity credential connected to verified identity and attestations. That distinction matters. A transferable digital asset may change holders. A verified identity credential should not. If the credential could sim…
What Makes Digital Trust Possible? Digital trust cannot depend on promises alone. Liberion’s Nation of Trust is built around three core commitments: 🛡 Privacy by Design 🤝 Identity by Consent 🔐 Trust without Exposure In practice, they become four principles: Reusable Identity Verified identity and attributes can be reused across supported services. Consent-Based Sharing Only the required proof or agreed attribute…
How Liberion Works in Four Steps Liberion transforms verification into reusable digital trust. 1️⃣ Verification A person, company, project, or AI agent owner completes the relevant verification process. 2️⃣ S-NFT Passport issuance After successful verification, a reusable and non-transferable digital identity credential is issued. 3️⃣ Proof sharing by consent A supported service requests only the proof or attribu…
LIBERION: Four Key Components LiberionID, the S-NFT Passport, Wallet and Vault are connected — but they are not the same thing. 🪪 LiberionID The digital identity system that connects verification, attributes and trusted access. 🛡 S-NFT Passport A non-transferable identity credential linked to verified status. 📱 Wallet The user application and control interface for identity, permissions and connected services. 🔐 …
The Four Sides of the Digital Economy The digital economy now connects four key participants: 👤 People 🏢 Companies 🚀 Projects 🤖 AI agents Trust must work between all of them. People need to verify who they interact with. Companies need trusted users, partners and automated agents. Projects need transparent teams and counterparties. AI agents need a verifiable link to the person or organization behind them. Liber…
The Identity Tax One person joins five different services. Each one asks for the same process: 📄 Upload your documents 🪪 Complete another ID check 🤳 Take another selfie ⏳ Wait for another approval The result is more friction, more copies of sensitive information and more points of potential exposure. Liberion is building a different model: ✅ Verify once ✅ Receive a reusable S-NFT Passport ✅ Share only what a con…
🔹 One Passport. Updatable Proof. Traditional identity verification creates a snapshot. Your document is checked once, but over time the information may become outdated. Documents expire. Roles change. New credentials are earned. Verification statuses are renewed or revoked. The Liberion S-NFT Passport is designed differently. Your passport remains unique and non-transferable, while its linked verified attestatio…
Your Data. Your Terms. Most digital platforms treat consent as a one-time checkbox. You click “Accept,” your information enters a system, and from that moment on, it becomes difficult to understand who can access it, what they can see, and for how long. Liberion is designed around a different principle: Identity by Consent. With Liberion: • A service requests only the information it needs. • You decide whether to…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Liberion_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liberion Channel” (@Liberion_Channel), 2,794 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liberion_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.