๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐

Channel
Lexi Marvel ๐ Alexandra Rae
@Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
22,103subscribers
+1,171 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002107931612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 22,103 | +10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 22,093 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 22,100 | +6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 22,094 | +15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 22,079 | +69 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 22,010 | +30 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 21,980 | +31 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 21,949 | +38 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 21,911 | +3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:51 | 21,908 | +11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 21,897 | +33 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 21,864 | +65 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 21,799 | +78 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 21,721 | +194 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 21,527 | +31 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 21,496 | +23 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 21,473 | +3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 21,470 | +54 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 21,416 | +53 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 21,363 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 1.61%
- avg views รท 22,103 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 356
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.468%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (10 September 2025 โ 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,847 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 18s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
575 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 193 | 33.6% | |
| โค | 186 | 32.3% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 63 | 11.0% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 41 | 7.13% | |
| ๐ | 21 | 3.65% | |
| ๐ | 19 | 3.30% | |
| ๐พ | 16 | 2.78% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 2.61% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 2.61% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 0.87% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.174% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 575 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 35 we hold a reading for ยท 3%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 September 2025 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โคโ๐ฅ1
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โคโ๐ฅ1
Cococospice
๐ฅ2โคโ๐ฅ1
Melanie Marie
โค1
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โค1โคโ๐ฅ1
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โคโ๐ฅ2
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โค3
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅ1
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐
โค4๐ฅ1
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
๐ฅ3โค2
๐ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU ๐ง
โค2๐ฅ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Alaine_Cheeks_alainecheeks ยท 5,9682 postsBryce Adams ๐ช Fitbryceadams
@Bryce_Adams_Fitbryceadams ยท 5,4632 postsDesiree Dee ๐ Desiiidesiresxoxo
@Desiree_Desiiidesiresxoxo ยท 15,0682 postsANTONELLA lasirena69 ๐
@ANTONELLA_lasirena69 ยท 55,4441 postBrenda Castro ๐น
@Brenda_Castro_brendacastroc19 ยท 17,1021 postCarter Cameron ๏ธ
@Carter_Cameron_CarterCameronFan ยท 5,9211 postChristina Khalil ๐ฅ Khalittle
@Christina_Khalil_khalittle ยท 13,8741 postCococospice ๐ Halle Spice
@Cococospice_Halle_Spice ยท 5,8001 postDahyana Gaitan ๐ Dahyn11
@Dahyana_Gaitan_Dahyn11 ยท 5,7871 postDani Tabares ๐ LillySullivan ๐ Sofiamariana
@Dani_Tabares_soydanitabaresbb ยท 6,5791 postEliza Rose Watson ๐งโโ๏ธ
@Eliza_Rose_Watson_Fans ยท 14,8191 postElyylabella ๐ Ely La Bella
@Elyylabella_Ely_La_Bella ยท 6,6431 postEmily Black ๐
@EmilyBlack_FansOnly ยท 42,7481 postFernanda Mota Farhat ๐
@Fernanda_Mota_Farhat_Fernanda ยท 16,8421 postGirlylana ๐ Lana Hill ๐ Yourlanabanana
@Girlylana_Lana_Hill_yourlanabana ยท 5,7281 postHaven Tunin ๐ Potteryprincess
@Haven_Tunin_Potteryprincess ยท 5,5941 postHope Heaven
@Hope_Heaven_thehopeheaven ยท 5,5671 postKaty Hollick ๐ฆ
@Katy_Hollick_KatyHollickFans ยท 5,0631 postLily Laness ๐จ Layla Roo
@Lily_Laness_Layla_Roo_lilylaness ยท 11,8101 postLylalush ๐
@Lylalush_Thelylalushh_Lyla_lush ยท 7,0721 postMacca Jp ๐งโโ๏ธ Macca0114 ๐งโโ๏ธ Macca03x
@Macca0114_Macca03x ยท 2,9841 postMati Khalifia
@Mati_Khalifia_matiii_MatiKhalifi ยท 4,9261 postMelanie Marie ๐
@Melanie_Marie_MelanieMarieFans ยท 5,3021 postMika Lafuente ๐
@Mika_Lafuente_MikaLafuente ยท 48,5981 postSolyluna24 ๐ฆ Melissa Herrera
@Solyluna24_Melissa_Herrera ยท 6,3611 postSophieraiin ๐ Sophie Rain
@Sophieraiin_Sophie_Rain ยท 36,1221 postVictoria Rae ๐ Vicraeee ๐ Queenpussybossv
@Vicraeee_queenpussybossv_Victori ยท 14,9261 postXofreja ๐ฎ Frejayeahh
@Xofreja_Frejayeahh ยท 9,4421 postZoe Renea ๐
@Zoe_Renea_ZoeReneaFans ยท 4,5791 poste30princess ๐ Tommi Ortega ๐ Angel Alektra
@e30princess_Tommi_Ortega ยท 9,4361 postLuvcoregf ๐
@luvcoregf_luvcoregffans ยท 14,2201 postQueenkalin
@queenkalinxxx_queenkalin ยท 10,5111 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Genie_Exum_genieeexumm ยท 5,5203 postsJessie Hirst ๐ฅ Jessie Jo
@Jessie_Hirst_Jessie_Jo_onlyjessi ยท 5,6123 postsAlaine Cheeks
@Alaine_Cheeks_alainecheeks ยท 5,9682 postsSolyluna24 ๐ฆ Melissa Herrera
@Solyluna24_Melissa_Herrera ยท 6,3612 postsCarter Cameron ๏ธ
@Carter_Cameron_CarterCameronFan ยท 5,9211 postCococospice ๐ Halle Spice
@Cococospice_Halle_Spice ยท 5,8001 postDani Tabares ๐ LillySullivan ๐ Sofiamariana
@Dani_Tabares_soydanitabaresbb ยท 6,5791 postGirlylana ๐ Lana Hill ๐ Yourlanabanana
@Girlylana_Lana_Hill_yourlanabana ยท 5,7281 postHailey Rose ๐
@Hailey_Rose_HaileyRoseFans ยท 7,0371 postHeralteregoo ๐ซถ๐ผ Rebecca McLeod
@Heralteregoo_Rebecca_McLeod ยท 3,5931 postKate Carvajal ๐ฅ Kathrin3
@Kate_Carvajal_Kathrin3 ยท 6,4411 postKaty Hollick ๐ฆ
@Katy_Hollick_KatyHollickFans ยท 5,0631 postLuvcoregf ๐
@luvcoregf_luvcoregffans ยท 14,2201 postMati Khalifia
@Mati_Khalifia_matiii_MatiKhalifi ยท 4,9261 postMelanie Marie ๐
@Melanie_Marie_MelanieMarieFans ยท 5,3021 postMika Lafuente ๐
@Mika_Lafuente_MikaLafuente ยท 48,5981 postXofreja ๐ฎ Frejayeahh
@Xofreja_Frejayeahh ยท 9,4421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โLexi Marvel ๐ Alexandra Raeโ (@Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans), 22,103 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lexi_Marvel_Rae_LexiMarvelFans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.