Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lanterns Season 1

Channel

Lanterns Season 1

@Lanterns_Season_1_2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63,044subscribers

+453 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003533783553
TypeChannel
Username@Lanterns_Season_1_2
DescriptionIndex: @Index_For_ETY Series: @Tv_Series_ETY_G Anime: @ETY_Anime_G Movies: @Movies_ETY_G Group: @ETY_Group_Chat Channels/Promo: @Yab_Store_1 Admin: @Yab_Support
Created25 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lanterns_Season_1_2

Growth

62,59163,04462,817.517 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 62,591 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 17:15 — 63,044 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 12:0017 Aug 2026, 17:15
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +453. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,523–63,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:1563,044+453
17 Aug 2026, 12:0062,591first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.22%
avg views ÷ 63,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.137%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held8 (25 March 202617 August 2026)
Views total23,510
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1781.0%
😁314.3%
🆒14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈3,300 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @Index_For_ETY

The Odyssey ( Almost HD ) ❤️‍🔥 Link Click S03 E01&E02 ❤️‍🔥 Bleach: TYBW S04 E04 🔥 One Piece E1174 🔥 Mushoku Tensei S03 E08 🔥 The Walking Dead: Dead City S03 E04 🔥 Detective Conan E1209 🔥 That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime S04 E18 🔥 Daemons of The Shadow Realm S01 E19 🔥 My Adventure With Superman S03 E10 🔥 House Of The Dragon ( Copyright Fix ) ✔️ Silo ( Copyright Fix ) ✔️ From ( Copyright Fix ) ✔️ F

4

17 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈4,150 viewsread 18 August 2026

How To Download (Click Here) Tv Series - @Tv_Series_ETY_G Anime - @ETY_Anime_G Movies - @Movies_ETY_G Store - @Yab_Store_1 ❤️‍🔥 Index For Series & Movies ❤️‍🔥

17 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈4,070 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

1

17 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈4,050 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Lanterns S01E01 ( Tv Series ) Download Now ⬇️

3😁3

17 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC≈3,930 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Lanterns ‣ Created by : Damon Lindelof ‣ Genres : Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Mystery, Action & Adventure ‣ Languages : en ‣ Episodes Runtime : Not Available ‣ First aired : 2026-08-16 ‣ Last aired : N/A ‣ Status : Returning Series ‣ Seasons : 1 ‣ Total EPs : 8 ‣ Average Rating : 6.824 ‣ Production Company : DC Studios ‣ OverView : Two intergalactic cops, new recruit John Stewart and Lantern legend Hal Jordan, are drawn into

9🆒1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Lanterns_Season_1_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 642,532 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lanterns Season 1” (@Lanterns_Season_1_2), 63,044 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lanterns_Season_1_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.