Global chatting gc... ⭐️⭐️💅💬 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 ✉️✉️✉️✉️🌟🌟🌟 📎 📎❤️
😘7🥰3👍2❤1

Channel
@LOSSER_00
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,844subscribers
+4,082 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002849391650 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LOSSER_00 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LOSSER_00 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 4,844 | +839 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 4,005 | -714 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 4,719 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 4,724 | -7 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 4,731 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 4,739 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 4,758 | +4,008 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 750 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 760 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 761 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 762 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 762 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
298 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😘 | 65 | 21.8% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 55 | 18.5% | |
| 😍 | 49 | 16.4% | |
| 🥰 | 46 | 15.4% | |
| custom 6152415771050905809 | 8 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5366384232727855051 | 7 | 2.35% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.671% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.336% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.336% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.336% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Global chatting gc... ⭐️⭐️💅💬 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 https://t.me/+V82BRLMw5DFkMjA9 ✉️✉️✉️✉️🌟🌟🌟 📎 📎❤️
😘7🥰3👍2❤1
Live stream finished (3 minutes)
Apna safar akele hi theek hai, Be-wajah kisi se umeed rakhna achi baat nahi....🌟❣️🦋
😘5😍4❤2👍2🥰2
Happy friendship day..... ❤️🫶
👍8❤6😘5🥰3
अनुभव सच में एक बेहतरीन स्कूल है,बस साला...❣️🌟🌟
🥰5😍5👍4😘3❤2😢1custom 53663842327278550511custom 61524157710509058091
I offered you a beginning, while you were still orbiting an ending. How could we ever begin, when your heart still belonged to something unfinished? And beginnings rarely survive borrowed endings❤️🔄❣️
👍5❤3😍3😘3🥰2custom 53663842327278550512🔥1custom 61524157710509058091
Genz the real heroes 🤌 What began as a protest for justice over the NEET paper leak became a scene of confrontation. Students gathered at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, demanding transparency, accountability, and a fair examination process. As tensions escalated, reports and visuals showed police using
❤6🥰3😍3😘3👍2🤡2custom 61524157710509058092😭1
Global chatting gc... ⭐️⭐️💅💬 https://t.me/+4MS5saL8C1w4OGE1 https://t.me/+4MS5saL8C1w4OGE1 ✉️✉️✉️✉️🌟🌟🌟 📎 📎❤️
❤4😍4👍3🥰3😘1custom 53663842327278550511custom 61524157710509058091
今夜、@LOSSER_00 はハリウッドで行われた と @arjun_512 パフォーマンスを観客席から鑑賞しました。ファッションショーにも慣れている @LOSSER_13 のスターは、ランウェイに登場してもおかしくないような装いで登場しました。🖼💲⭐️
😍5😘5❤2👍2🥰2
That decision you made last night… Sometimes we think so much about a goal that our mind already feels the adrenaline that was supposed to come after achieving it. And when it’s finally time to act, the motivation is gone. Multiplied by zero. Most of us are stuck in places we desperately want to ...✍️✍️🪶
😍5❤4😘4🥰3
🖤💗🦴
❤7😘5👍3🥰2😍2
Mann ki chah pooran kar do"⬅️ You can hear this prayer in every eye❣️✍️❣️
❤4👍4🥰2😍2😘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LOSSER_00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴄᴇ ✨🕊️” (@LOSSER_00), 4,844 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LOSSER_00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.