Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LESTER

Channel

LESTER

@LORD_LESTER0111

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

74,883subscribers

+6,896 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001703224052
TypeChannel
Username@LORD_LESTER0111
Description#lordLester #WinningMindset ADMIN~ @LORD_LESTER VIP GROUP~ https://t.me/+QErpxG-z6cwyNzE0
Created19 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LORD_LESTER0111

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@LORD_LESTER0111 was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@LEGEND_KIM100
held 1 September 20261 September 2026
@LORDLESTER001
held 10 August 202610 August 2026

Growth

67,27975,02471,151.510 August 2026 — 67,987 subscribers11 August 2026 — 68,220 subscribers12 August 2026 — 68,266 subscribers12 August 2026 — 68,625 subscribers14 August 2026 — 68,769 subscribers15 August 2026 — 68,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 68,568 subscribers18 August 2026 — 68,721 subscribers19 August 2026 — 68,725 subscribers20 August 2026 — 68,849 subscribers21 August 2026 — 68,910 subscribers22 August 2026 — 68,593 subscribers24 August 2026 — 68,576 subscribers25 August 2026 — 68,461 subscribers26 August 2026 — 68,361 subscribers27 August 2026 — 68,160 subscribers28 August 2026 — 68,035 subscribers1 September 2026 — 67,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 67,326 subscribers2 September 2026 — 67,279 subscribers3 September 2026 — 67,407 subscribers4 September 2026 — 67,492 subscribers5 September 2026 — 68,095 subscribers5 September 2026 — 68,095 subscribers8 September 2026 — 70,059 subscribers11 September 2026 — 70,823 subscribers13 September 2026 — 73,646 subscribers14 September 2026 — 75,024 subscribers16 September 2026 — 74,883 subscribers74,88310 August 202616 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 37 days, net +6,896. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,117–76,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:4274,883-141
14 Sept 2026, 16:3675,024+1,378
13 Sept 2026, 02:3873,646+2,823
11 Sept 2026, 05:3670,823+764
8 Sept 2026, 11:3570,059+1,964
5 Sept 2026, 12:2068,095no change
5 Sept 2026, 11:4768,095+603
4 Sept 2026, 21:0067,492+85
3 Sept 2026, 02:0867,407+128
2 Sept 2026, 01:1567,279-47
1 Sept 2026, 11:3067,326no change
1 Sept 2026, 11:1567,326-709
28 Aug 2026, 10:3268,035-125
27 Aug 2026, 11:1368,160-201
26 Aug 2026, 08:1268,361-100
25 Aug 2026, 07:2368,461-115
24 Aug 2026, 10:1468,576-17
22 Aug 2026, 18:1568,593-317
21 Aug 2026, 05:2268,910+61
20 Aug 2026, 05:4768,849first reading

Engagement

297 posts held, back to 19 May 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.01%
avg views ÷ 74,883 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,000
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 297 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 120 of 153 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held297 (19 May 202216 September 2026)
Views total918,198
Reactions total11,434
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24,360 reactions across 227 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19,63880.6%
❤‍🔥1,0654.37%
🔥9713.99%
3501.44%
💯2731.12%
🙏2501.03%
🎉2200.903%
🏆2200.903%
🥰1870.768%
🍾1730.71%
🕊1610.661%
👍1510.62%
🫡1330.546%
😍1260.517%
🙊1070.439%
🤩580.238%
👏500.205%
🤝440.181%
🎄380.156%
🤗360.148%
4 further kinds1090.447%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 297 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 297 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2022 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 279 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LORD_LESTER0111. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 297 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2022 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 06:44 UTC≈3,040 views121 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

STAKE AS GIVEN ✅👌 CODE 👾 H4XSAW LORD LESTER 🔥🍾🔥🔥

102🔥7💯4🤩3🙊3❤‍🔥1🫡1

15 Sept 2026, 22:06 UTC44 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

NBA 🏀🏀🏀 194 odds Code>. https://t.me/+RCPUjOkF-jwzNWU0

Showing the 12 most recent of 297 posts we hold for @LORD_LESTER0111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTCAnonymous Poll606 voters

READY FOR WEEKEND TICKETS

  1. 3 TICKET VIP66%
  2. 2 TICKET VIP46%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 297 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2022 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LESTER” (@LORD_LESTER0111), 74,883 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LORD_LESTER0111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.