Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Владимир Савенок — Личный Капитал

Channel

Владимир Савенок — Личный Капитал

@LKapital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,140subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001346881881
TypeChannel
Username@LKapital
Created9 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LKapital

Growth

5,1405,1645,1526 August 2026 — 5,164 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,164 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,145 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,140 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,136–5,168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:175,140-5
12 Aug 2026, 11:365,145-9
9 Aug 2026, 12:415,154-9
6 Aug 2026, 17:005,163-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:005,164no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:555,164first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 5,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total8,179
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

327 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6118.7%
👍5015.3%
💯4313.1%
288.56%
288.56%
🤝175.20%
🙏164.89%
🤔154.59%
👌133.98%
👀123.67%
😎123.67%
😁72.14%
❤‍🔥61.83%
😱61.83%
🤩51.53%
🤗30.917%
🤯20.612%
🏆10.306%
😢10.306%
🙈10.306%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC687 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bcc_investPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥8👌4🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC959 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

WILDBERRIES – БУДЕТ БАНКРОТСТВО? Что думаете о маркетплейсе? Судя по всему, склады планируют добивать. А это – прямой путь к банкротству компании. Но компания не работает автономно – она плотно связана с другими компания и, в первую очередь, с банками РФ. В этой связи больше волнует вопрос устойчивости финансовой системы РФ. Будут ли банкротства банков после банкротства Wildberiies? Напишите, что думаете по этому

💯5👍2😱211👀1🔥1🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC918 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЧТО ЛУЧШЕ - ETF’S, УПРАВЛЯЕМЫЕ AI ИЛИ ИНДЕКСЫ? Было бы странно, если бы с бурным развитием ИИ на рынке не появились бы фонды и ЕТФы, которые управляются с помощью ИИ. И они появились. Их немного пока, но некоторым уже почти 10 лет. В следующем посте дам примеры таких ЕТФ и покажу, как они сработали по сравнению с индексами. Но сначала хочу провести опрос (ниже). Благодарю за участие в опросе. #ВладимирСавенок #ИИ

1🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC938 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«ФОНДОВЫЙ РЫНОК РФ СКОРО ИСЧЕЗНЕТ!» По итогам онлайн встречи «О текущей ситуации в РФ» 14 июля 2026 года (запись онлайн встречи можно посмотреть здесь) Решил написать этот пост, т.к. до меня дошла информация о том, что я «рекомендовал» делать инвесторам в текущей ситуации. Например, один человек сказал, что я рекомендовал СРОЧНО продать все акции и длинные облигации. Другой - еще круче. Цитата: «Владимир сказал, что

🔥169🙏5💯4🤝41❤‍🔥1😎1

24 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЦБ - НЕОЖИДАННОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ПО СТАВКЕ ЦБ понизил ставку. Очень неожиданно для меня и для большинства аналитиков. Думаю, это больше политическое решение... Нельзя понижать ставку при растущей инфляции.

4💯1😎1

21 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC≈1,350 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2🤔2❤‍🔥1👌1💯1🤗1🤝1😎1

21 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,250 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

24 ИЮЛЯ – ДЕНЬ ЦБ РФ Самое ожидаемое событие на финансовом рынке России – решение Совета директоров ЦБ по ключевой ставке. Для меня решение ЦБ очевидно. Как и для большинства из вас и других аналитиков. Тем не менее, давайте посмотрим, что вы думаете о решении, которое примет ЦБ 24 июля. Прошу принять участие в опросе ниже. @LKapital #ВладимирСавенок #СтавкаЦБ #ключеваяставка

2👀1🤔1🤝1😎1🙈1

17 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПРИБЫЛИ РЕКОРДНЫЕ, А NASDAQ В МИНУСЕ Отчетный период. Банки, чиповые компании показывают рекордный рост прибыли. При этом NASDAQ третий день идет вниз. Кто понимает настроение инвесторов? Какие причины падения цен при росте прибылей? @LKapital #ВладимирСавенок #NASDAQ #акции

👀21👍1💯1🤔1😎1

16 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,380 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

О ТЕКУЩЕЙ СИТУАЦИИ В РФ (продолжение) На онлайн встрече 14 июля я рассказал о том, какие активы считаю на сегодняшний день приоритетными и почему я так считаю (запись встречи - здесь). Основные причины – рост инфляции, возможный рост ставки, просадка экономики. ❗️И вот пришла свежая статистика: 👉 Инфляция – рост за последние 3 недели впечатляющий: 0.06 - 0.10 - 0.18 - 0.24%. О снижении ставки ЦБ в июле можн

👍96🔥31💯1🤔1🤝1😎1

15 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SpaceX - НИЖЕ УРОВНЯ IPO😮 Всего-то через один месяц... Есть "счастливчики", которые купили в первые дни выхода акций на рынок? #ВладимирСавенок #SpaceX

👌2🤔2👀1🤯1😎1😱1

15 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,100 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вчера провели онлайн-встречу с Владимиром Савенком. Обсудили ситуацию на фондовом рынке, ответили на главные вопросы инвесторов. Здесь вы можете посмотреть запись встречи.

🙏5💯4👍2🔥21👌1🤔1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LKapital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 375,311 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Владимир Савенок — Личный Капитал” (@LKapital), 5,140 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LKapital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.