Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Leo Messi Iran | لئو مسی

Channel

Leo Messi Iran | لئو مسی

@LEOMESSIIRA

Not marked by Telegram, checked 19 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,640subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002239840554
TypeChannel
Username@LEOMESSIIRA
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LEOMESSIIRA

Growth

1,6391,6401,639.518 August 2026 — 1,639 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,639 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,640 subscribers18 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,639–1,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 15:561,640+1
18 Aug 2026, 19:131,639no change
18 Aug 2026, 18:451,639first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 1,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held9 (17 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total1,522
Reactions total171
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥7845.6%
5833.9%
👍2313.5%
🔥84.68%
😍31.75%
💘10.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC65 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

❤️✨ 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

🔥5😍3💘1

Signed Arman

18 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC114 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🔻از سال 1966 تاکنون، فقط 6 بازیکن در تاریخ جام جهانی موفق شده‌اند در یک دوره، هم حداقل 5 گل به ثمر برسانند و هم حداقل 5 موقعیت بزرگ گلزنی (Big Chances) خلق کنند: ماریو کمپس - جام جهانی 1978 6 گل _ 5 موقعیت بزرگ خلق‌شده دیه‌گو مارادونا - جام جهانی 1986 5 گل _ 8 موقعیت بزرگ خلق‌شده دیه‌گو فورلان - جام جهانی 2010 5 گل _ 6 موقعیت بزرگ خلق‌شده لیونل مسی - جام جهانی 2022 7 گل _ 7 موقعیت بزرگ خلق‌شده لیونل مسی - جام جه

❤‍🔥15

Signed Arman

18 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC127 views19 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📸 تصاویر لئو از تمرینات امروز 🩷🐐 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

❤‍🔥19

Signed 𝒯𝑀 🇦🇷

18 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC130 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🔻مقایسه عملکرد لیونل مسی و کریستیانو در 1166 بازی: 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

❤‍🔥17

Signed Arman

18 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC133 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🔻بیشترین دریبل موفق در فصل 2011/12 ( آمار پنج لیگ برتراروپا+لیگ قهرمانان) 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

10

Signed Arman

18 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC172 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒉𝒂𝒎 𝟐 — 𝟒 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒂 🇪🇺 𝑼𝑬𝑭𝑨 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝑳𝒆𝒂𝒈𝒖𝒆 🏟 𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 – 𝑭𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝑳𝒆𝒈 - 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟖/𝟏𝟗 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

18🔥2

Signed 𝒯𝑀 🇦🇷

17 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC264 views30 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

MESSI WORLD CUP 2022 🆚 MESSI WORLD CUP 2026 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

❤‍🔥272🔥1

Signed 𝒯𝑀 🇦🇷

17 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC259 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Messi destroyed a granada by scoring a hattrick 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

24

Signed Arman

17 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC258 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🔻روند تغییر امتیاز مسی در FC: 𓃵 @LeoMessiLapulga 𓃵

👍234

Signed Arman

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @LEOMESSIIRA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,280 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

لیونل مسی | Leo Messi | آرژانتین
@BarcelonaCF10 · 78,400
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
بارسلونا | بارسا | Barca
@barcelonair · 78,818
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال اصلی بارسلونا ( بارسا )
@BarcelonaTweetir · 64,812
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leo Messi Iran | لئو مسی” (@LEOMESSIIRA), 1,640 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LEOMESSIIRA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.