✅ Going Live @ 10:45 AM Jump in Now https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX

Channel
LEAN-CHAMPIONS
@LEANCHAMPIONS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,175subscribers
-296 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001403035166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LEANCHAMPIONS |
| Description | https://webinar.leanmurali.com/LeanSixSigma-Training Register 👆🏿To Join FREE Lean Six Sigma Training. -----🎯To Help 1 Million Passionate Professionals To Become Lean Campions🏆 - Dr. Lean Murali - Lean Master Coach |
| Created | 10 May 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LEANCHAMPIONS |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 43,175 | -33 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 43,208 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 43,227 | -33 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 43,260 | -17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 43,277 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 43,295 | -21 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 43,316 | -9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 43,325 | -11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 43,336 | -25 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 43,361 | -25 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 43,386 | -40 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 43,426 | -88 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 43,514 | -86 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 43,600 | -173 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 43,773 | +62 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 43,711 | -27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 43,738 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 43,728 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 43,736 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 43,751 | first reading |
Engagement
331 posts held, back to 10 May 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.68%
- avg views ÷ 43,175 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,160
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.202%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 331 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 331 (10 May 2020 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 91,459 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 04:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Links
- 17
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
494 reactions across 140 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 196 | 39.7% | |
| ❤ | 184 | 37.2% | |
| 👏 | 54 | 10.9% | |
| 🏆 | 32 | 6.48% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 1.82% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.01% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.81% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.607% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.607% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.405% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.202% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.202% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 331 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 331 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2020 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
CTQs are defined as aspects of a product or service that are critical to:
- a) Quality Assurance33%
- b) Customer Satisfaction60%
- c) Employee Engagement7%
- d) Cost Reduction1%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
LEAN-CHAMPIONS pinned a photo
FREE LinkedIn Skill-X Live Session https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX Learn how to turn LinkedIn into Jobs, Leads & Clients 👨🎓 Students – Get your first job quickly 👔 Professionals – Get your dream job faster 💼 Freelancers – Find the right clients early Date :24 Oct 2026 Time :11:00 AM IST Mode : Zoom 👉 Register now – limited seats! https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX
❤1
📚LEAN SIX SIGMA Learning📖 🔗https://tinyurl.com/First-Pass-Yield-Explained Please share your comments in this article on First Pass Yield Explained: Measuring Quality at the Source 🔗https://tinyurl.com/First-Pass-Yield-Explained Happy LEARNing & LEANing Dr. Lean Murali
In VOC analysis, what does it mean if a customer expresses a need as a Must-Have?
- a) It is a nice-to-have feature7%
- b) It is a critical requirement81%
- c) It is irrelevant to the product8%
- d) It is not important to the customer4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅ Going Live @ 8PM IST Jump in Now : https://webinar.leanmurali.com/Leansixsigma-Career
LEAN-CHAMPIONS pinned a photo
🚀 Exciting Announcement! ⏰ Today at 8:00 PM 👉 Register Now: https://webinar.leanmurali.com/Leansixsigma-Career 🎓 How to Get Your Lean Six Sigma Certification & Land Your Dream Job in the Next 50 Days Learn directly from Dr. Lean Murali (Lean Master Coach) in this LIVE webinar. . Discover how Lean Six Sigma can accelerate your career growth . Learn the easiest path to certification for beginners . Get a proven roa…
❤1
🚀 New Quote on Instagram! 🚀 If you can’t describe what you are doing as a process, you don’t know what you’re doing. By William Edwards Deming Looking for a dose of motivation❓ 👉🏻Check out my latest Instagram post! It’s all about staying inspired and pushing through challenges with positivity and determination. 👉:https://tinyurl.com/Q161-Quotes-William-Edwards Let’s inspire each other to keep moving forward, no mat…
What does VOC refer to in quality management?
- a) Verification of Customer Expectations10%
- b) Voice of the Company9%
- c) Validation of Customer Complaints14%
- d) Voice of the Customer66%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Going Live @ 8:00 pm Jump in Now https://webinar.leanmurali.com/LeanSixSigma-Training
Showing the 12 most recent of 331 posts we hold for @LEANCHAMPIONS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 55 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
CTQs are defined as aspects of a product or service that are critical to:
- a) Quality Assurance33%
- b) Customer Satisfaction60%
- c) Employee Engagement7%
- d) Cost Reduction1%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In VOC analysis, what does it mean if a customer expresses a need as a Must-Have?
- a) It is a nice-to-have feature7%
- b) It is a critical requirement81%
- c) It is irrelevant to the product8%
- d) It is not important to the customer4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What does VOC refer to in quality management?
- a) Verification of Customer Expectations10%
- b) Voice of the Company9%
- c) Validation of Customer Complaints14%
- d) Voice of the Customer66%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When analyzing a Pareto Chart, which category should be addressed first?
- A) The category with the longest bar19%
- B) The category with the lowest frequency7%
- C) The category with the highest frequency or impact78%
- D) The category with the shortest bar3%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What is the purpose of the cumulative percentage line on a Pareto Chart?
- A) To represent the average value3%
- B) To show the distribution of data11%
- C) To indicate the cumulative contribution of each category81%
- D) To display trends over time5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In a Pareto Chart, how are the categories arranged?
- A) Alphabetically3%
- B) By their frequency or impact, from highest to lowest86%
- C) By their alphabetical order of frequency8%
- D) Randomly3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 331 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2020 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@nikunjbhoraniya · 24,727#1
@digital_e_learning007 · 6,755#2
@leanvlog · 2,329#3
@Qualityprofessionals · 14,516#4
@learn_statistics · 1,372#5
@itilmaterial · 8,322#6
@linkedin_learning · 217,441#7
@generaciondeleads · 225#8
@HarvardBusinessReviewChannel · 22,290#9
@IT_Audit · 7,208#10
@soccerarena · 1,908#11
@TrumpPOTUS47 · 190#12
@Recruitmenservices · 27,371#13
@finance_books_tg · 18,288#14
@Tinyknowledge · 1,365#15
@CSATMathematics · 31,773#16
@bestinjobs · 12,684#17
@TheDesiAnalyst · 751#18
@HeArTHaaCKeRr · 895 (as read 10 September 2026)#19
@qa2qas · 717#20
@easymathsol · 886#21
@masteryden · 469#22
@findmynewjob · 1,422#23
@QAQC5 · 3,478#24
@bcube · 429#25
@whatsseentracker · 1,682#26
@NotesGallery1 · 88,568#27
@answersq · 9,036#28
@happysmiles · 8,629#29
@Mechanicalengineeringskills · 947#30
@placementtolekerahenge · 22,230#31
@KnowledgeMap · 1,963#32
@OmranPMP · 6,044#33
@be_the_expert · 1,272#34
@Behappy_and_love_nature · 2,699#35
@marvelousppl · 2,315#36
@ChatpataDun · 7,256#37
@robertfkennedyjr · 1,518#38
@wallpapermuslimahku · 1,521#39
@nuovogiornalenazionale · 644#40
@CISA_AuditclubwithMohammedAhmed · 3,803#41
@Hdere12 · 164#42
@fitolanperu · 455#43
@cumedia · 837#44
@Nikkibatrainer · 4,307#45
@ninjagamblers · 1,133#46
@ekadashikatha · 620#47
@MasterNumbers9 · 1,001#48
@ruVsyachina · 1,258#49
@morcenter · 854#50
@brainstorm_ai · 3,983#51
@alsalamislamiccenter_kids · 3,517#52
@rinaldomorelli_news · 958 (as read 10 September 2026)#53
@CareersGulf · 6,953#54
@eduphilespace · 17,830#55
@tamilshare1 · 46,578#56
@DividendStockMarket · 1,524#57
@sarhelohim · 1,809#58
@blessedsutra · 968#59
@Brighten_Up_Your_Mind · 12,701#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nikunjbhoraniya · 24,727
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
@Recruitmenservices · 27,371
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEAN-CHAMPIONS” (@LEANCHAMPIONS), 43,175 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LEANCHAMPIONS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.