Garvee Quad Elettrico per Bambini 12V, Telecomando, Doppio Motore, Bianco | Bandierina LED sospesa con connessione wireless USB, adatta a bambini dai 3 agli 8 anni, carico massimo 30 kg 🎫 COUPON spunta la casella ✔️ 💶 A 139,49€ ▶️ AMAZON 🔗https://amzn.to/4qavfJy
Views per post sit far below this size band
4.2 average views per post against 2,606 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.161%. Across the 806 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,001–3,155 subscribers, posting mainly in Italian — the middle half sit between 12.0% and 35.2%, with a median of 21.6%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 84 |
| Mature posts only | 0.197% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,606 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:ita · 806 channels · p10 5.81% · p25 12.0% · p50 21.6% · p75 35.2% · p90 53.7% |
| Position in cohort | 0.000th percentile · 1/143 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.111% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Italian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
