国庆快乐🤗🤗🤗

Channel
深圳好评反馈群
@LD8869LL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,248subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003955391659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LD8869LL |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LD8869LL |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 3,248 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.63%
- avg views ÷ 3,248 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 85.5
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (22 August 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 513 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 37
- Videos
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ILVE 我是最最最靠谱的
#深圳会所 #深圳罗湖 #罗湖顶级95 #深圳福田 #深圳水会 #深圳宝安 #深圳罗湖 #深圳龙华 #制服诱惑 (郑重承诺) 资源保证品质高,不以次充好【不忽悠,不套路,】 拒绝套路,直接对话,极速安排 – 【不欺不瞒】 靠谱经营,不做虚假夸张,每一个细节都经得起检验。 – 【无忧通道】 绕过中介骚扰,一手资源,保证您的隐私与安全。 诚信经营,不骗不坑,要的是专业与口碑,只做长久生意。 【深圳全区域94-95会所】📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 🥵服务范围:深圳📱📱📱📱(需提前半小时预约); 🤒服务内容:深圳各区94会所·95会所,罗湖·福田·南山·宝安·龙华·龙岗·光明全覆盖! 丝足玩到爽·巨乳胸推室息·花式口爆射爆一条龙服务! 舒适雅致的环境,贴心细致的服务,技师妹妹用心呵护每一次体验,让您在轻松的氛围中释放压力,找回身体与心情的平衡。; 🥵 服务优势:20-28岁技师,穿整洁制服,携带一次性用品(精油/毛巾/床单)…
周六就火爆了🤣 必须安排到位
只推荐最好的
一如既往的支持
Channel photo updated
Photo, posted without a caption
哈哈哈哈 第三次 反食
下次必定带朋友一起来
今晚的MVP 出击完第一家 出击第二家 MVP
不预约是没有服务的 过来必须提前预约 以免闹乌龙
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @LD8869LL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳好评反馈群” (@LD8869LL), 3,248 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LD8869LL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.