Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KUZHUGET ANAY-KHAAK

Channel

KUZHUGET ANAY-KHAAK

@KuzhugetovnaA

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,997subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058734218
TypeChannel
Username@KuzhugetovnaA
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 October 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/KuzhugetovnaA

Growth

1,9972,0042,000.54 October 2026 — 2,004 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,004 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,004 subscribers9 October 2026 — 1,997 subscribers4 October 20269 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,996–2,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 06:391,997-7
5 Oct 2026, 00:272,004no change
5 Oct 2026, 00:222,004no change
4 Oct 2026, 23:472,004first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 1,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
547
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held10 (9 September 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total4,924
Reactions total289
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

328 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526027294680653215211133.8%
custom 52580319359506966206620.1%
custom 58327101350923500025817.7%
custom 5775916214874281431247.32%
custom 5258480875997245539154.57%
custom 5832562469821746227113.35%
custom 5260281691359946611103.05%
custom 537993559757607512482.44%
custom 585948414946679480382.44%
custom 525811131983122709572.13%
custom 584613052491288191461.83%
custom 583219531454244773020.61%
custom 584613286996502462220.61%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 10 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KuzhugetovnaA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC427 views22 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 525803193595069662011custom 58461305249128819144custom 53799355975760751243custom 52584808759972455392custom 52581113198312270951custom 58327101350923500021

21 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC515 views91 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Photo

Как считаете насколько плохо? Это вышивка на спортивной сумке Плохо - 😭 Сильно плохо - 😭 Не расстраивайся - 😔 Я вышивала на машинке эту фигню 2 часа!!! Потренила 1-2 раза и в итоге так

custom 583271013509235000257custom 525848087599724553913custom 58594841494667948038custom 52581113198312270956custom 53799355975760751243custom 58321953145424477302custom 58461305249128819142

18 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC587 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026

Я вот думаю я сдала экзамен по греческому. Ждем полгода результаты. Надеюсь А2 у меня уже есть)))

custom 526027294680653215211custom 52580319359506966208custom 57759162148742814315

18 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC555 views22 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526027294680653215213custom 52580319359506966206custom 57759162148742814313

18 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC555 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526027294680653215214custom 57759162148742814316custom 52580319359506966204

17 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC559 views29 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Photo

Сделала новый тортик Ферреро Роше🤍 Попробовала такой новый дизайн. Как же дорого он выглядит, но потратила я на него от силы 13-14 евро, из которых 11 клубника😄

custom 526027294680653215214custom 58325624698217462277custom 52580319359506966205custom 52602816913599466111custom 53799355975760751241custom 57759162148742814311

15 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC595 views35 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Photo

Вот так вот отпускайте меня к парикмахеру. Отстригла себе челку)))) Очень нравится))) скрывает щечки мои. Сразу не бейбик, а лэйди

custom 525803193595069662018custom 52602729468065321527custom 57759162148742814316custom 52602816913599466114

15 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC556 views18 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526027294680653215211custom 52580319359506966204custom 52602816913599466113

15 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC575 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526027294680653215214custom 52580319359506966206custom 58325624698217462274

9 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC808 views39 reactions1 Starread 5 October 2026
Photo

Моя швейная эра! 🪡 Мне реально ничего другого не хочется делать😁

custom 526027294680653215227custom 52580319359506966204custom 57759162148742814313custom 52602816913599466112custom 58461328699650246222custom 53799355975760751241

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @KuzhugetovnaA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aydyn8 | ХӨӨН
@hooon_music · 36,699
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 4 October 2026
ЫРЫЛАР🎵
@tyva_01 · 18,938
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KUZHUGET ANAY-KHAAK” (@KuzhugetovnaA), 1,997 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KuzhugetovnaA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.