Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KING SOLOMON’S CHART 📈🎖️🥂

Channel

KING SOLOMON’S CHART 📈🎖️🥂

@Kingsolomon4lyf1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,679subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002015095777
TypeChannel
Username@Kingsolomon4lyf1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kingsolomon4lyf1

Growth

1,6791,7091,6947 August 2026 — 1,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,693 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,694 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,709 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,693 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,691 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,687 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,683 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,679 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 24 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,675–1,714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 11:431,679-4
28 Aug 2026, 04:571,683-4
25 Aug 2026, 01:051,687-4
21 Aug 2026, 07:221,691-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:341,693-7
14 Aug 2026, 16:361,700-9
11 Aug 2026, 05:371,709+15
8 Aug 2026, 04:221,694+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:021,693no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:061,693first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.25%
avg views ÷ 1,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total21
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3792.5%
💯12.50%
😭12.50%
🤣12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/kingsolomon4lyf/status/2085815170106794456?s=46 It’s weekend, let’s get better 🤍

1

3 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Thread dropped 🔥 https://x.com/kingsolomon4lyf/status/2084274921899696436?s=46

2

1 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC140 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/kingsolomon4lyf/status/2083532744068346331?s=46

2

1 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC131 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

New video alert kinds. It’s weekend let’s get better 🤗📈

3

26 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC259 viewsread 7 August 2026

Send me a dm for your rewards if you funded your prime xbt account and took trades 🤝

14 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC420 viewsread 7 August 2026

⏳ Giveaway ends in 1 week. 🏆 Winners will be announced shortly after the event closes 🤝 Good luck, and happy trading everyone! 🔥

14 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC422 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Trading gold, you can also enjoy during weekends; • 10% Cashback • Up to $4,690 in Trading Bonuses through the Reward Center

14 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC412 viewsread 7 August 2026

How to enter 👇 1. Sign up here: https://u.primexbt.com/KingSolomon 2. Make a First Deposit of at least $15 (Trade as much as you can) 🥇 The 8 most active traders during the giveaway period of 1 week will each receive a $20 trading coupon!

14 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC286 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

To celebrate the launch of Gold (XAUUSD) 24/7 trading on PrimeXBT, we are giving away 8 × $20 trading coupons! 🏆💰 8 WINNERS • $20 Trading Coupon each. That’s $160 up for grabs! All you have to do is 👇

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Kingsolomon4lyf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KING SOLOMON’S CHART 📈🎖️🥂” (@Kingsolomon4lyf1), 1,679 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kingsolomon4lyf1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.