3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,288–1,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 17:38
1,339
+44
5 Nov 2026, 18:30
1,295
-10
4 Nov 2026, 19:22
1,305
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.81%
avg views ÷ 1,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.6
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
17 (2 November 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
639
Reactions total
59
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
64.4%
🔥
15
25.4%
👏
5
8.47%
😁
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Pixels & Plotlines • ✨
Nina Caliente × Samantha Jones
Both are often portrayed as confident, independent, and comfortable with their romantic choices. They don’t fit the idea that everyone has to want the same kind of relationship.
Their shared vibe: knowing what you want—and being unapologetic about it.
نینا کالینته و سامانتا جونز معمولاً مستقل، بااعتمادبهنفس و راحت با انتخابهای عاطفی خودشون به تصویر کشیده می…
ترجمه :
بعضی وقتا از خودم میپرسم کدوم نسخهی من، خود واقعیمه؟
اون آدم پرحرفی که کنار دوستاشم؟ اون آدم ساکتی که کنار غریبهها میشم؟ اون نسخهی حرفهای که سعی میکنه جوری به نظر بیاد که انگار همهچیز زندگیش مرتبه؟
یا اون نسخهای که ساعت دو شب با خودش حرف میزنه و مکالمههای سال ۲۰۱۹ رو دوباره مرور میکنه؟
راستش، همهشون خود منن.
فکر میکنم یادمون میره که متفاوت بودن کنار آدمهای مختلف، لزوماً به معنی نقش بازی کردن …
Transcript :
Sometimes I wonder which version of me is the real one.
The loud one with friends? The quiet one around strangers? The professional one when I’m trying to look like I have my life together?
Or the version of me who talks to herself and replays conversations from 2019 at two in the morning?
Honestly, all of them are me.
I think we forget that being different around different people doesn’t automatically …
Astro Perspective #5 • 🪐
In astrology, Venus is traditionally associated with attraction, values, pleasure, and the way we relate to others.
در استرولوژی، زهره بهطور سنتی با کشش، ارزشها، لذت و شیوهٔ ارتباط ما با دیگران مرتبط است.
Astrologers interpret Venus through its sign, house, and aspects rather than relying on the sign alone.
منجمان جایگاه زهره را از طریق برج، خانه و جنبههای آن تفسیر میکنند، نه فقط بر اسا…
Case Uncovered • #FalseAppearances
Ordinary on the Outside
Rader had a job and community responsibilities while hiding his crimes. People around him did not necessarily see the full picture.
A familiar face or respectable role is not proof of someone’s character.
ریدِر شغل و مسئولیتهای اجتماعی داشت، درحالیکه جنایتهایش پنهان مونده بودن. اطرافیانش لزوماً از تمام واقعیت خبر نداشتن.
آشنا بودن چهره یا داشتن جایگاه…
ترجمه :
قرار گذاشتن توی نسل ما واقعاً یه شغل پارهوقته با استرس تماموقت!
با یکی آشنا میشی، شروع میکنین به پیام دادن و یهو داری زمان جواب دادنش رو تحلیل میکنی؛ انگار برای دکترا داری داده بررسی میکنی!
دیروز از سه تا ایموجی استفاده کرده، امروز فقط یکی. جالبه! تحقیقات ادامه داره.
اصلاً ما چی هستیم؟ دوستیم؟ بیشتر از دوستیم؟ دو نفری که هر روز پیام میدن ولی به هر دلیلی هیچوقت تکلیف رابطه رو مشخص نمیکنن؟
دیگه پروانه…
Transcript :
Dating in this generation is honestly a part-time job with full-time stress.
You meet someone, start texting, and suddenly you’re analyzing reply times like you’re studying data for a PhD.
They used three emojis yesterday and only one today. Interesting. The investigation continues.
And what are we, exactly? Friends? More than friends? Two people who text every day but somehow never define anything?
At …
Pixels & Plotlines • 🌹
Johnny Zest × Chandler Bing
Humor is a big part of how both characters connect with others. Jokes can make awkward moments easier—but sometimes humor can also keep deeper feelings out of the spotlight.
When does being funny help, and when does it become a shield?
شوخیکردن بخش مهمی از ارتباط جانی زست و چندلر بینگه. شوخی میتونه موقعیتهای awkward رو راحتتر کنه؛ اما گاهی هم احساسات عمیقتر …
Relationship Lens #5 • 🪟
Not every relationship needs to have the same level of closeness.
لازم نیست همهٔ رابطهها به یک اندازه صمیمی باشند.
Some people may be wonderful companions for fun, while others are better suited for vulnerable conversations.
بعضی آدمها همراهان خوبی برای خوشگذرانیاند، درحالیکه بعضی دیگر برای گفتوگوهای عمیق و آسیبپذیرانه مناسبترند.
Expecting every person to meet every emotional need …
Case Uncovered • #CriminalPsychology
The Need for Attention
Rader sent letters to media outlets and police, claiming responsibility for crimes. His communications helped turn the investigation into a public story.
In this case, the desire to control the narrative also created clues for investigators.
ریدِر نامههایی برای رسانهها و پلیس میفرستاد و مسئولیت جنایتها رو به عهده میگرفت. همین پیامها پرونده رو به مو…
❤3
Signed K.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KimiaSpeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖡𝖾𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖥𝖾𝖾𝖽” (@KimiaSpeaks), 1,339 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KimiaSpeaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.