4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,263–2,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 16:02
2,265
+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:37
2,263
-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:32
2,264
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:21
2,264
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.0%
avg views ÷ 2,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
929
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
19,515
Reactions total
1,165
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 40s
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,165 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
468
40.2%
❤
274
23.5%
🔥
238
20.4%
🏆
100
8.58%
😁
34
2.92%
🥰
11
0.944%
🤩
9
0.773%
🤝
6
0.515%
👏
5
0.429%
⚡
4
0.343%
😇
4
0.343%
🙏
4
0.343%
🍓
3
0.258%
💯
3
0.258%
😢
2
0.172%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 21 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KanyginCode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔴 Внимание Казань — 8 августа Pulse Forum conference в вашем городе! Затем Екатеринбург.
Если вы давно наблюдаете за развитием Pulse Platform и нашей командой со стороны — самое время познакомиться с этим вживую.
А если вы уже внутри — приезжайте, чтобы увидеть людей, с которыми мы вместе строим это большое движение.
На конференциях поговорим о том, что происходит с Pulse сегодня, какие возможности открываются дал…
Пятница зарплатница.
Как вам идея создать такой доход 7 дней в неделю в SEVEN LAB?
Пока однажды принятое решение привело меня к этому:
Понедельник - выплата с пулов в Pulse Platform ≈1000$
Четверг - выплата с fin flow в RWA NFT ≈ 350$
Пятница - выплата с ликвидности в Pulse Platform 1350$
+ через 30 дней начнет приходить каждый день 112$ в Atlas System.
И это только с инвестиций.
Но самое интересное - это дох…
Продолжаю челендж «дари и получай» отправляю ещё 500$ в помощь объединившимися вокруг этой идеи и через 30 дней буду пожинать плоды и я. Динамика положительная и это только начало. Познакомится с этим и другими направлениями нашей команды можно на нашей платформе SEVEN LAB.
+1000$ к депозиту за месяц на пассиве и на автореинвесте в инструменте RWA NFT.
Но я решил отключить автореинвест, что бы был повод показывать как работает этот продукт, как мне будет капать от 50$ в день и как это отражается на моей жизни.
Отправляю 3 подарок 500$ на 30 дней в систему атлас и пополняю пул ликвидности для помощи участникам.
Всего три дня в системе, а уже как будто три недели, судя по количеству встреч и бонусов.
Многие не начинают зарабатывать в крипте тк думают, что надо быть супер программистом или трейдером. Но на самом деле, что бы разбогатеть, нужно перестать быть жадиной.
Не надо жадничать и пытаться выгрести из системы больше,…
Отправляю ещё 500$ в подарок на 30 дней и встаю в очередь на получение подарка с 22.5%.
Кто-то в таких системах опасается оказаться последним. Я каждый день становлюсь последним. Если так будут делать многие, создавать подарок каждый день, разделив на 30 частей 1/7 от своих свободных средств, то мы создаем вероятность пребывать в благополучии дольше всех.
(почему на 1/7, а не 1/5? Потому что решил что красивее и ло…
Соскучился я по этим непрекращающимся уведомлениям, которые сейчас у всех, кто понял идею SEVEN LAB.
Построил один раз бизнес, достиг результата, и теперь твой результат сохраняется на каждом этапе, как в компьютерной игре.
И ветка вероятности, что кому то придется начинать всё заново, как это было ранее у всех, полностью исключается.
Мы открыли для себя новый инструмент.
Начинаю благодарительный челендж🩵
Отправляю ежедневно подарок 500$ во Вселенную и через 30 дней возможно система пришлет и мне подарок.
Моя стратегия как правильно использовать инструмент: Взять 1/5 часть от своих свободных средств для таких экспериментов. Разделить эту часть на 30 и открывать ежедневно подарки, что бы получить вероятность получать подарки через 30 дней каждый …
Важная информация так же для тех, кто видел эту волну, но выбрал по каким-то причинам её пропустить.
Это был настоящий феномен на рынке. Эти результаты увидели даже те, кто никогда не принимал участия в подобных проектах.
Кто работал в рамках риск менеджмента, заработали немыслимые средства.
Другие наблюдали со стороны, сомневались, ждали — а потом поняли, что большая денежная волна уже прошла мимо них.
Но этот у…
👍40❤16🥰11😁9🏆5😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @KanyginCode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 951,435 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Код Каныгина” (@KanyginCode), 2,265 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KanyginCode.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.