11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,148–36,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 21:04
36,192
-2
15 Aug 2026, 09:04
36,194
+13
13 Aug 2026, 23:55
36,181
+22
12 Aug 2026, 18:03
36,159
+5
11 Aug 2026, 14:29
36,154
-9
10 Aug 2026, 13:02
36,163
-20
9 Aug 2026, 11:33
36,183
+3
8 Aug 2026, 15:03
36,180
-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:26
36,191
-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:30
36,197
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:24
36,197
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.38%
avg views ÷ 36,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
49 (6 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
166,280
Reactions total
6,008
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,470
Videos
≈17,900
Links
≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
31m 23s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,008 reactions across 49 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,871
47.8%
🔥
1,464
24.4%
👍
967
16.1%
🥰
234
3.89%
😁
213
3.55%
🤩
161
2.68%
👏
86
1.43%
🎉
6
0.1%
🤔
4
0.067%
😢
2
0.033%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,008reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⛓️⛓️ Цепи, пожалуй, самая убедительная ювелирная база. Их история насчитывает тысячелетия: сложные золотые цепи умели делать уже античные мастера, а дальше менялись эпохи, масштабы и способы носить их - сама идея оставалась.
В этом и есть их редкое качество: цепь практически не имеет ограничений в стиле и уместности: с майкой и денимом, с рубашкой, кашемиром, жакетом или с вечерним платьем. Одна хорошая цепь может п…
🪸 Кажется, кораллами мы увлеклись всерьёз, не только мы, но и наши партнёры, и вы. Поэтому, решили пойти глубже и записали для вас новую ювелирную историю.
Почему коралл веками считали оберегом, при чём здесь Медуза Горгона и как одна маленькая красная веточка путешествовала через культуры и столетия. Будет очень интересно❗️
✅Задать вопрос, запросить
подбор украшений и доп. фото, оформить заказ вы можете здесь :
@…
Воскресные витрины салона JV ✨
✅Задать вопрос, запросить
подбор украшений и доп. фото, оформить заказ вы можете здесь :
@JewelryVladimirbot
Мы в других социальных сетях ⬇️
❤️ в Вконтакте и MAX
Как НЕ НАДО носить украшения❌
📝Небольшая памятка: как любить бижутерию, чтобы отношения были долгими ❤️❤️
Ничего сложного, буквально несколько привычек:
1️⃣ Сначала духи, кремы, лак для волос - потом украшения. Активные компоненты лучше держать подальше от вашей шкатулки, они точно не подружатся.
2️⃣ Сняли украшение, протрите его нашей специальной салфеткой. Мы не зря заботливо кладём её к каждой покупке.
3️⃣ Сп…
🪩 2026, 2027 и 2028 обещают не просто принести нам возрождение ретро эстетики, но и ещё добавить в нашу жизнь сверкание кристаллов. Судя по тренд-аналитике, кристаллы всерьез возвращаются в наш повседневный гардероб.
И DYRBERG/KERN здесь, конечно, один из наших фаворитов. Мало кто так умеет работать с кристаллами, сдержанно, элегантно и без лишней торжественности. Чтобы носить не «на выход», а каждый день с жакетом,…
🌈 У наших любимых и уже точно любимых вами «Каскадов» новый цвет.
Прохладный голубой. Прохладный, чистый, освежающий и совершенно особенный цвет в образе. Оттенок, который хочется добавить сейчас и забрать с собой в осень.
«Каскады» умеют удивлять даже тогда, когда кажется, что мы уже знаем о них всё 🆒
✅Задать вопрос, запросить
подбор украшений и доп. фото, оформить заказ вы можете здесь :
@JewelryVladimirbot
М…
☝🏼 И последнее, но не менее важное, что нужно знать о Nature Bijoux.
За всей этой визуальной свободой стоит серьезное ремесло. Украшения собираются вручную, а одна вещь, в зависимости от сложности, может проходить от 10 до 40 этапов изготовления. Над коллекциями работает команда из 12 мастеров различных специализаций.
Поэтому они и выглядят не как массовый аксессуар.
Это вещи, которыми можно одним движением собрат…
🏁А вот здесь начинается самое интересное.
За десятилетия Nature Bijoux собрали собственную библиотеку - более 1200 природных материалов. Дерево, перламутр, семена, камни, кора, раковины и множество совершенно неожиданных вещей.
Нам нравится сама эта философия: ценность не обязательно рождается из драгоценности материала. Иногда она рождается из идеи, редкого сочетания и взгляда дизайнера.
Поэтому Nature Bijoux нев…
🌳 Nature Bijoux. Франция. И очень красивая история длиной больше сорока лет.
Все началось с увлечения природой: основатель марки Жан-Даниэль Кристен занимался орнитологией и ботаникой, собирал минералы и раковины, и только потом начал превращать найденные материалы в украшения. Сам бренд появился в 1987 году и до сих пор остается семейным делом.
Наверное, поэтому Nature Bijoux сложно воспринимать просто как бижутер…
🔥48👍13❤11🤩2😢2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @Jewelry_Vladimir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Jewelry_Vladimir edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 983,765 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jewelry_Vladimir” (@Jewelry_Vladimir), 36,192 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jewelry_Vladimir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
