Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 巴黎哪儿有东京忧郁 Chat

Supergroup

巴黎哪儿有东京忧郁 Chat

@JapanChats

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,023members

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

83 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001305271216
TypeSupergroup
Username@JapanChats
Description解封/商务/其他任何联系 : @appdo_bot 低质量讨论规避原则:本群不鼓励群成员进行低质量争论,讨论事情时请言之有物就事论事,避免人身攻击、扣帽子和无端推测。 平等尊重原则:群成员在宗教、性别、性取向、职业、身份、所属社会团体上平等,请勿以此为依据展开任何形式的非理性攻击,否则您的发言会被当即删除。 群主唯一原则:群主有权判断本群成员的去留。
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held15
On Telegramt.me/JapanChats

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0111,0231,0176 August 2026 — 1,016 members7 August 2026 — 1,017 members10 August 2026 — 1,015 members13 August 2026 — 1,011 members16 August 2026 — 1,012 members19 August 2026 — 1,011 members26 August 2026 — 1,012 members1 September 2026 — 1,013 members4 September 2026 — 1,014 members10 September 2026 — 1,017 members13 September 2026 — 1,016 members18 September 2026 — 1,015 members27 September 2026 — 1,020 members5 October 2026 — 1,023 members8 October 2026 — 1,023 members6 August 20268 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 63 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,009–1,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
8 Oct 2026, 19:061,023no change
5 Oct 2026, 11:141,023+3
27 Sept 2026, 19:361,020+5
18 Sept 2026, 00:221,015-1
13 Sept 2026, 22:191,016-1
10 Sept 2026, 09:171,017+3
4 Sept 2026, 17:171,014+1
1 Sept 2026, 00:271,013+1
26 Aug 2026, 05:361,012+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:371,011-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:081,012+1
13 Aug 2026, 15:351,011-4
10 Aug 2026, 20:111,015-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:241,017+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:411,016first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“巴黎哪儿有东京忧郁 Chat” (@JapanChats), 1,023 members as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JapanChats.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.