If anyone have Claude or Cursor or Codex then please help me Id : @User_Died_X I need urgent
๐ฏ10โค8โก5๐5๐ฅ4๐คฏ4๐3๐3

Channel
@Indian_Hackers_Team
On this record: Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Advertising ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
7,658subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192694316 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Indian_Hackers_Team |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Indian_Hackers_Team |
This channelโs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ 60%, no better than a coin flip โ because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 7,658 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 7,659 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 7,674 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 7,688 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 7,686 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 7,684 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 7,684 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (10 June 2026 โ 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,644 |
| Reactions total | 301 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
648 reactions across 27 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 146 | 22.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 71 | 11.0% | |
| ๐ | 60 | 9.26% | |
| ๐ | 50 | 7.72% | |
| โก | 47 | 7.25% | |
| ๐ฏ | 43 | 6.64% | |
| ๐ | 41 | 6.33% | |
| ๐คฏ | 33 | 5.09% | |
| ๐ | 32 | 4.94% | |
| ๐ฑ | 29 | 4.48% | |
| ๐ | 28 | 4.32% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 2.78% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 14 | 2.16% | |
| ๐ญ | 11 | 1.70% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 1.39% | |
| ๐คฉ | 9 | 1.39% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.463% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1 | 0.154% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.154% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.154% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.154% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 648reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #ัะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides โ nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means โthe share of posts that declared themselvesโ, never โthe share of posts that were paid forโ. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched โ for topic, for length, for hour of day โ so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
If anyone have Claude or Cursor or Codex then please help me Id : @User_Died_X I need urgent
๐ฏ10โค8โก5๐5๐ฅ4๐คฏ4๐3๐3
Channel photo updated
๐จ Google AI Plus is back! ๐ Google is offering 12 months of Google AI Plus for FREE to eligible students! ๐คโจ If youโre a student, apply now: https://gemini.google/in/students/
๐ฅ9โค4โก3๐ฅฐ3๐2๐1
๐ฎ๐ณ Happy Independence Day! ๐ฎ๐ณ เคเคฏ เคนเคฟเคเคฆ! ๐ฎ๐ณ เคตเคเคฆเฅ เคฎเคพเคคเคฐเคฎเฅ! ๐ Let us celebrate the spirit of freedom, unity, and patriotism. Proud to be Indian! โค๏ธ๐ฎ๐ณ
โค9๐5๐4๐3๐2๐2โก1๐ฅ1
Channel photo updated
๐ Atomesus Pro โ 1 YEAR FREE! ๐ โก Get 1 Year of Pro Access FREE ๐ณ No Payment Required โ Official Promo Method ๐ How to Claim: 1๏ธโฃ Visit atomesus.com 2๏ธโฃ Sign up with your email 3๏ธโฃ Open your Profile icon 4๏ธโฃ Enter this code: ATOMESUS 5๏ธโฃ Enjoy 1 Year of Pro Access FREE! ๐ฅ Claim it before the offer ends! โค Spread the Value! Join Indian Watchdogs โก๏ธ @Indian_Hackers_Team ============================ #Ad ๐ค Want To Buy โฆ
๐คฉ5โค4โก2๐2๐ฅฐ2๐1๐ฅ1๐1
๐ SPECIAL GIVEAWAY: GET FREE INSTAGRAM BOOST! ๐ Want FREE Instagram Reel Views, Likes, or Followers? We are giving away free services to support our loyal customers! ๐ Choose Any 1 Option For FREE: 1๏ธโฃ ๐ฌ 5,000 Instagram Reel Views 2๏ธโฃ โค๏ธ 100 Instagram Post Likes 3๏ธโฃ ๐ค 10 Instagram Real Followers ๐ HOW TO CLAIM IN 3 SIMPLE STEPS: 1๏ธโฃ Leave a 5-Star Review on our official Trustpilot page: ๐ https://www.trustpilot.cโฆ
๐ฅ4โค3๐3๐2โก1๐1๐1๐คฉ1
Voice message, posted without a caption
๐ฅ6๐3โค2๐2โก1๐1๐ฏ1๐คฉ1
๐ค Manus AI Agent: Limited-Time Free Trial for 15 Days! No Credit Card Required! Manus, a general-purpose AI Agent tool, is offering a limited-time free trial! From now until August 25, 2026, you can experience the automated task execution capabilities of Manus 1.6 and Manus 1.6 Lite versions without needing to bind a credit card. ๐ How to Get Started: 1๏ธโฃ Access the platform: Visit the web interface directly: httpsโฆ
๐ฅ8โก5โค5๐ฏ5๐4๐4๐3๐3
๐Deepgram $200 FREE AI Credits โ If you're working with Al, speech recognition, or voice applications, here's another freebie worth claiming. Deepgram is offering $200 in free promotional credits for eligible new users. โช๏ธ$200 in free Deepgram credits โช๏ธ No credit card required โช๏ธ Access to Speech-to-Text (STT) โช๏ธAccess to Text-to-Speech (TTS) โช๏ธ Voice Al APIs for development ๐ฅ How to claim: โช๏ธ Sign up for a free โฆ
โค11๐6โก5๐5๐คฏ5๐3๐ฅ3๐3
๐ฅ CHATGPT PLUS โ 1 MONTH FREE METHOD ๐ฒ๐ฝ Get 30 days of ChatGPT Plus for $0 using the Mexico VPN trick! ๐ HOW TO CLAIM ($0 CHECKOUT): 1๏ธโฃ Connect VPN โ Set your VPN location to Mexico ๐ฒ๐ฝ 2๏ธโฃ Open ChatGPT โ Go to https://chatgpt.com & sign in (or register a new account) โ Tip: Use Incognito mode for best results ๐ต๏ธโโ๏ธ 3๏ธโฃ Claim Free Offer โ Click "Upgrade to Plus" or "Try Plus" โ The $0.00 promo offโฆ
๐12โค11๐10๐5๐ฅ5โก3๐คฏ3๐2
*๐ก Shellfire VPN [12 Months]* ๐ https://www.shellfire.net/cobi ๐ Code: cb-5dn4-rrao โ Instructions: 1. Enter email + Code. 2. Select "Redeem Option 1". 3. Verify email & Login. Join Indian Watchdogs โก๏ธ @Indian_Hackers_Team ============================ #Ad ๐ค Want To Buy Followers? ๐SignUp Now : https://indiasmmpanel.in
โค12โก7๐5๐ฅ5๐4๐ฏ4๐3๐ฅฐ3
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Indian_Hackers_Team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 20,185 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโก๏ธ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ง ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ ๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฅโก๏ธโ (@Indian_Hackers_Team), 7,658 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Indian_Hackers_Team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.