Channel
@IbnhezamEn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,827subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001391959800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IbnhezamEn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IbnhezamEn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 2,827 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 2,826 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 2,831 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 2,833 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 2,834 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (23 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,395 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 50 ) 📩 Question: The questioner asks: Was Iblis (may Allah curse him) one of the angels? 📝 The answer: It has been explicitly stated in the Noble Quran that he is from among the Jinn. Allah Almighty says: "And [mention] when We said to the angels, 'Prostrate to Adam,' and they prostrated, except for Iblis. He was of the jinn and departed from…
**In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful* Fatwa No. ( 49 ) 📩 Question: The questioner asks: What is the ruling on using Jinn for service (*Istikhdam al-Jinn fi al-Khidmah*)? 📝 The answer: One must stay away from this, even if some Jinn claim that they serve without human worship toward them; for the devils of the Jinn do not serve except alongside worship directed to them. As Allah Almighty s…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 48 ) 📩 Question: What is the ruling on someone who denies the demonic possession of a human by a Jinn (*Talabbus al-Jinni bil-Insi*)? 📝 The answer: Such a person is considered astray, deviant, and rejecting of textual proofs (*Dallun Mukhtarifun Yaruddu al-Adillah*). Authentic, clear, and obvious proofs have arrived demonstrating that this oc…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 47 ) 📩 Question: Is the world of Jinn a real world? And what is the ruling on someone who denies the existence of Jinn? 📝 The answer: Yes, the world of Jinn is a real world. Allah Almighty created them for great wisdom, which is to worship Him: > *"And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me. I do not want from them any pro…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 46 ) 📩 Question: Is there a standard rule (*Dabit*) for affirming the Beautiful Names of Allah Almighty? And why did disagreement occur among the scholars regarding some of the Names in terms of affirmation and negation? 📝 The answer: The sound method in affirming the Beautiful Names of Allah (*Al-Asma' al-Husna*) is that they must be explici…
**In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful* Fatwa No. ( 45 ) 📩 Question: Should the marriage contract (*'Aqd al-Nikah*) take place in the mosque or elsewhere? 📝 The answer: The marriage contract can take place in any location, but evil places should be avoided—such as places of amusement, musical entertainment, and the like, and Allah's help is sought. Because it is a legal Shar'i contract, and…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 44 ) 📩 Question: The questioner asks: If a sick person is taken to a soothsayer (*Kahin*) or a sorcerer (*Sahir*) against his will—where he did not want to go, but his family took him by force—does he bear sin or not? 📝 The answer: * If the situation reached a point where he was unable to refuse due to his illness: The sin lies upon those…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 43 ) 📩 Question: What is the status of the saying: *"Whatever yields a profit higher than its cost price is unlawful (Haram)"*? 📝 The answer: This saying has no Shar'i evidence to support it and is not correct. However, one should treat Muslims with kindness and leniency: * If a person purchases something, he should show gentleness to them, …
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 42 ) 📩 Question: The questioner asks: What is the ruling on a man saying to his brother, *"Send blessings upon the Prophet"* (*"Salli 'ala an-Nabi"*), when he wants to speak to him or calm him down? Is there any issue with doing so? 📝 The answer: Sending blessings upon the Prophet (ﷺ) is among the most virtuous deeds. However, mentioning it i…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 41 ) 📩 Question: Sometimes an altercation occurs between two disputing parties, so a third person steps in to reconcile them and says to one of them: *"Remember Allah"* or *"Send blessings upon the Messenger of Allah."* Out of severe anger, the person responds: *"I will not remember Allah, nor will I send blessings upon the Prophet."* What is t…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 40 ) 📩 Question: Should one pray behind someone who wipes over socks (*Al-Jawarib*) during Wudu? 📝 The answer: Wiping over socks is established through Shar'i proofs. Among them is the Hadith of Thawban (رضي الله عنه) in *Musnad Ahmad* and *Sunan Abi Dawud*, that the Prophet (ﷺ) commanded them to wipe over turbans/head-coverings (*'Asa'ib*) an…
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Fatwa No. ( 39 ) 📩 Question: A questioner from Germany asks: Who has more priority to deliver the Friday sermon (*Khutbah*) among us? Is it someone who speaks in Arabic, after which we translate for the people between the two sermons, or someone who delivers the sermon in their own language? 📝 The answer: May Allah bless you. You should seek a preacher (…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @IbnhezamEn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 361,176 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fatawa of Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam Al-Ba'dany” (@IbnhezamEn), 2,827 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IbnhezamEn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.