Channel
@IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,024subscribers
-195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001122116879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR |
| Description | ✅THE MOST USEFUL MATERIALS AND LESSONS FOR IELTS CEFR MULTILEVEL👌 FROM ZERO TO HERO😉 Online kurslar uchun : @EFL_TUTOR (Tutor since 2006) NO ADS!!! OUR RESULTS: @results_ogk ALL USEFUL : https://t.me/addlist/NYhxFAskZDI2YmUy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 9,024 | -32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 9,056 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 9,056 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 9,069 | -32 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 9,101 | -49 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 9,150 | -54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 9,204 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 9,219 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 August 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,216 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 43.5% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇬🇧 INGLIZ TILI TA’LIMIDA YANADA TAKOMILLASHGAN YANGI BOSQICH 📑 Ingliz tili fanidan Milliy o‘quv dasturi o‘quvchilarning til ko‘nikmalarini bosqichma-bosqich rivojlantirish, bilimlarni hayotiy vaziyatlarda qo‘llash va zamonaviy kompetensiyalarni shakllantirishga yo‘naltirilgan. 📚 Dastur nechta bosqichdan iborat? 🔹 Boshlang‘ich ta’lim — 1–4-sinflar 🔹 Tayanch o‘rta ta’lim — 5–9-sinflar 🔹 O‘rta ta’lim — 10–11-sinflar …
❤2👍1
Chet tillaridan 2026-yilning 2-yarmida bo‘lib o‘tadigan milliy sertifikat imtihonlari 📆 Chet tilini bilish darajasini aniqlash test sinovlari avgust, sentabr, oktabr, noyabr va dekabr oylarida bo‘lib o‘tadi. 🧑💻 Bunda nemis va fransuz tillaridan imtihonlar elektron shaklda o‘tkaziladi (kompyuterda olinadi). 🆔 Test sinovi uchun talabgorlar my.gov.uz sayti orqali onlayn tarzda ro‘yxatga olinadi. ⛳ Ro‘yxatdan o‘tish…
Ingliz tili 8-9-sinf soatlari ham hafasiga 4 soatdan bo'lishi mumkin Respublika ta'lim markazi tomonidan Davlat ta’lim standartlarini yangilash bo'yicha UMUMIY O‘RTA TA’LIMNING DAVLAT TA’LIM STANDARTLARI VA O‘QUV DASTURLARI UCHUN JAMOATCHILIK MUHOKAMASI PORTALIga Yangi DTS bo'yicha Tayanch o'quv rejasi jamoatchilik fikrini o'rganish uchun joylandi. Unda Chet tili fani uchun jami 31 soat ajratilgan. amaldagisi 29 soa…
Barchangizga ushbu kanalni tavsiya qilaman, bugungi exam javoblaring eng to'g'ri holatlari berib borilmoqda. Shoshilamiz🆘🆘🆘🆘
"CEFR" degan bosh og'riqdan qutula olmay yuribsizmi? Men Eldor Khusanov 13 yillik tajribaga ega ingliz tili ustozi, testolog, PhD , repetitor, 6000+ o'quvchilarning sevimli ustozi Ingliz tilini o'rganishda bir tonna muommolar orasida qolib, qiynalayotgan bo'lsangiz siz to'g'ri joydasiz. Bugundan CEFR imtixonlarida qiynaladigan minglab yoshlarga o'z ilmimni "ONLINE" ta'lim berib ulashib borishga qaror qildim Hozir…
❤1
Kurs narxini sorab kopchilik yozipti Ikki xil kursga qabul boshlanyapti: 1. Reading (Writing task 2 bonus qilib o’tiladi) - 155 ming 2. ITEP kursi (to’liq) - 370 ming P.S : mandan baza so’ramayla iltimos xoxlagan test tushsa ishlab oladigan texnikalar o’tiladi ! Murojaat : @EFL_tutor
BIZDA SIZ UCHUN AJOYIB TAKLIF BOR!!! Readingni kozimizzi yumib ishledigan bolamiz inshaAlloh Reading kichik kursi ochilyapti!!! kichik degani bilan juda kichikmas !! Nimalarga erishamiz kurs yakunida? - Reading savol turlarini yaxshi tushunvolamiz -Reading ishlash texnikalarini togri qollashni organamiz -ITEP reading matnlarini tahlil qilamiz ISHONING JUDAYAM MANFAATLI BO’LADI INSHAALLOH
Bekorga xalqimiz orasida:,, Ustoz otanday ulug'" demaslar balki. Nima deysiz, hurmatli kuzatuvchilar? Aslida, bugungi ta'limimizning inqiroziga ustozning qadrsizlanishi bosh omil emasmi? Fikrlaringizni commentlarda kutaman.🙏🏻
💯4
https://t.me/IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR
👍2
Мустақиллик байрамида неча кун дам оламиз? 🟡 29-август, шанба – одатий иш ёки дам олиш куни 🟢 30-август, якшанба – одатий дам олиш куни 🟢 31-август, душанба – барча учун қўшимча дам олиш куни 🟢 1-сентябр, сешанба – Мустақиллик байрами куни 2-сентябр, чоршанба – барча учун одатий иш куни. 👉 https://t.me/IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR
Photo, posted without a caption
✔️Haqiqiy imtihonga yaqin qiyinlik darajasi ✔️Ingliz tilining asosiy ko‘nikmalarini sinovdan o‘tkazish ✔️O‘zingizga qulay vaqtda test topshirish imkoniyati ✔️Natijangizni bir kun ichida bilish imkoniyati
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 245,524 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS, CEFR, MULTILEVEL ( OZODA GALIULINA) ☪️” (@IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR), 9,024 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IELTS_Multilevel_CEFR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.