Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Горячие кружки - Hot mugs

Channel

Горячие кружки - Hot mugs

@Hot_mugs0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,529subscribers

+4,414 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003661608104
TypeChannel
Username@Hot_mugs0
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hot_mugs0

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,11518,52916,3227 August 2026 — 14,115 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,115 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,214 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,368 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,452 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,564 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,680 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,849 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,992 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,169 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,340 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,455 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,717 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,849 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,127 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,249 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,315 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,406 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,521 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,631 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,749 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,882 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,919 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,924 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,045 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,262 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,581 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,798 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,992 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,146 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,318 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,529 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +4,414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,453–19,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:3818,529+211
17 Sept 2026, 03:5818,318+172
15 Sept 2026, 02:1518,146+154
13 Sept 2026, 10:3917,992+194
11 Sept 2026, 14:1817,798+217
9 Sept 2026, 00:1817,581+319
5 Sept 2026, 19:2017,262+217
3 Sept 2026, 18:4017,045+121
2 Sept 2026, 09:3416,924+5
1 Sept 2026, 08:0916,919+37
31 Aug 2026, 06:2716,882+133
30 Aug 2026, 05:3616,749+118
29 Aug 2026, 08:0616,631+110
28 Aug 2026, 10:4916,521+115
27 Aug 2026, 07:1316,406+91
26 Aug 2026, 07:1516,315+66
25 Aug 2026, 04:3216,249+122
24 Aug 2026, 00:0916,127+278
22 Aug 2026, 08:0715,849+132
20 Aug 2026, 19:5215,717first reading

Engagement

361 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 18,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
164 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
166
of 361 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 164 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held361 (7 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total593,508
Reactions total1,455
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,888 reactions across 334 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌1,01935.3%
90931.5%
🔥39813.8%
😍32211.1%
👍1073.70%
👎652.25%
🍓471.63%
🤬210.727%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 342 of the 361 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 357 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Hot_mugs0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 361 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.16%
15 of 361 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
3,310
over 15 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,490
over 342 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 2 September 2026
AdvertisementVideo

🔥 Первое видео с заменой лица — бесплатно! 🎬 Более 4000 видео‑шаблонов 📸 Замена лица на фото и видео 🎁 Бонусы и подарки при пополнении 💥Создай порно со своей подругой прямо сейчас! 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @dffvideo_bot ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ 🔥 First face swap video — FREE! 🎬 Over 4000 video templates 📸 Swap faces in photos & videos 🎁 Bonuses & gifts with top-ups 💥 Make porn with your girlfriend right now! 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 #реклама

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,440 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌81🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,460 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌53

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,540 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌14🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,580 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌5🔥41

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,650 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥9🍌4😍21

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,700 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌85

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,740 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌12🍓31

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,800 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👎20🍌9🤬4🔥3😍2🍓1

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,940 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌6

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈5,010 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌93

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈5,050 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍌101😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 361 posts we hold for @Hot_mugs0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Горячие кружки - Hot mugs” (@Hot_mugs0), 18,529 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hot_mugs0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.