Channel
@HooshRah_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003962709998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HooshRah_com |
| Created | 9 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HooshRah_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 16 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 14 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (9 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 199 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥هوش مصنوعی ChatGPT پلاس برای کیا خوبه؟ اگر یکی از اینایی، احتمالاً به دردت میخوره: - تولیدکننده محتوا(سئو کار ها و.. ) - دانشجو - فریلنسر (برنامه نویس و..) - کسی که کارهای متنوع داره - تمام کسب کار ها برای متن، تصویر، فایل، ایده، یادگیری و کلی کار روزمره خیلی کاربردیه اگر دنبال یک ابزار عمومی و قوی میگردی، ChatGPT خیلی وقتها اولین انتخاب خوبه اگه هدفت اینه که بیزینستو رشد بدی حتما این بهت کمک میکنه اگر خو…
🤖 خرید از ربات خیلی سادهست 1️⃣) وارد ربات شو 2️⃣) محصول یا اکانتی که میخوای رو انتخاب کن 3️⃣) پلن و قیمتها رو ببین 4️⃣) سفارش ثبت کن 5️⃣) اگر جایی سوال داشتی، پشتیبانی هست اگر اهل خرید مستقیم نیستی، اول سایت رو ببین اگر هم آمادهای، از ربات شروع کن 👇 🤖 @hooshrahbot 🌐 HooshRah.com @HooshRah_com
✔️چرا هوشراه؟ اول نیاز، بعد ابزار قرار نیست هر چیزی رو به زور بفروشیم انتخاب بدون حدس اگر شک داری، کمک میکنیم راحتتر گزینه بهتر رو پیدا کنی فراتر از اکانت هوشراه فقط فروش اکانت نیست؛ کمکم ابزارها و راهکارهای هوشمندتر هم میاد خرید سادهتر ربات، سایت، پشتیبانی و مسیر خرید مشخصه + نماد اعتماد الکترونیکی اگر نمیدونی کدوم گزینه بیشتر به کارت میاد، ازمون بپرس اگر هم میدونی چی میخوای، مستقیم از ربات یا سایت برو…
☑️ کدوم بیشتر به کارت میاد؟ اگر بیشتر کارت ایناست: 1️⃣محتوا / تصویر / کارهای روزمره اول ChatGPT رو ببین 2️⃣کدنویسی / پروژه / متنهای طولانی و سئو ساخت اپ و... اول Claude رو ببین 3️⃣تحقیق / سرچ / ابزارهای گوگل اول Gemini رو ببین 4️⃣اگر هنوز هم بین گزینهها شک داری، لازم نیست شانسی انتخاب کنی فقط بگو بیشتر چه کاری انجام میدی تا راحتتر جمعش کنیم 👌 💬 پشتیبانی: @HooshRah_support 🤖 خرید: @hooshrahbot @HooshRah_com
👍1
📌 ☑️ فرق ChatGPT، Claude و Gemini چیه؟ اگر خیلی ساده بخوام بگم: ChatGPT همهفنحریفه برای محتوا، تصویر، فایل، کارهای روزمره و استفاده عمومی خیلی خوبه Claude برای متنهای طولانی و کدنویسی خیلی قویه اگر برنامهنویسی میکنی یا زیاد با متن و فایل سر و کار داری، گزینه خوبیه برای سئو کار ها و.. هم فوقالعاده الان جذابه Gemini برای تحقیق و کار کنار ابزارهای گوگل جذابه اگر زیاد با Gmail، Docs، Drive و سرچ و تحقیق درگیری،…
👍1
✔️سلام رفقا، خوش اومدین به هوشراه اینجا قراره اکانت و ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی رو راحتتر و شفافتر پیدا کنی از ChatGPT و Claude و Gemini بگیر تا کمکم ابزارها و راهکارهای هوشمندتر اگر نمیدونی کدوم به کارت میاد، کمک میکنیم راحتتر انتخاب کنی اگر هم میدونی چی میخوای، از ربات میتونی مستقیم سفارش بدی 👇 🤖 خرید: @hooshrahbot 💬 پشتیبانی: @HooshRah_support 🌐 سایت: HooshRah.com @HooshRah_com
😒 با این ۱۰ حالت اختصاصی کلاد، بازدهیت رو ببر بالا! 👨🏻💻 استفادهی مداوم از همون صفحهی چتِ سادهی همیشگی برای تمام تسکها، از کدنویسی تا تحقیق و برنامهریزی، بزرگترین دلیلِ افت بازدهی تو کار با هوش مصنوعیه! 📝 باید اینو بدونی که ابزار کلاد ده حالت (Mode) کاملاً مجزا داره که هر کدوم برای یه هدف خاص طراحی شدن
✔️برای چت جی پی تی ۳ مدل پلن داریم با پرداخت قانونی @hooshrahbot در ربات میتونید چک کنید @nftbartar
👍2
✔️سلام درود دوستان بلاخره بعد چند هفته سایت و ربات ما آماده شده @hooshrahbot hooshrah.com میتونید استفاده کنید @nftbartar
👍3
✔️فرق چتبات و ایجنت هوش مصنوعی چیه؟ 💬 چتبات معمولاً فقط به سؤال یا درخواست شما پاسخ میده و بیشتر واکنشی عمل میکنه. 🤖 AI Agent فقط جواب نمیده؛ هدف میگیره، برنامهریزی میکنه و دست به کار میشه. میتونه از ابزارها استفاده کنه و چند مرحله رو خودش انجام بده تا به نتیجه برسه. خلاصه: چتبات = جواب میده 💬 ایجنت = انجام میده ⚡️ @hooshrah_com
👍2
✔️لیست اکانت های موجود 1️⃣اکانت جمنای 18 ماه فقط 980 هزار تومان 2️⃣اکانت کلاد 1 ماه 4500 3️⃣اکانت چت جی پی تی قانونی روی ایمیل شما 1 ماه 4350 4️⃣اکانت چت جی پی تی 1 ماه از پیش ساخته شده اختصاصی 2200
Grok 4.6 بالاخره منتشر شد🔥 نسخه جدید Grok یعنی 4.6 از راه رسیده و طبق نتایج اولیه، توی چندین بنچمارک تونسته خودش رو به مدلهای مطرحی مثل Fable 5 و GPT 5.6 Sol نزدیک کنه. اما نکته جالبتر، عملکردش توی Frontend Arena ـه؛ جایی که Grok 4.6 با امتیاز 1553 فعلاً رتبه ۱۳ رو در اختیار داره. این مدل از همین امروز روی Cursor و Grok Build قابل استفادهست و برای هفته اول هم محدودیت استفادهاش رو بیشتر کردن؛ یعنی میشه با خیال …
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @HooshRah_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوشراه | اکانت و ابزار AI” (@HooshRah_com), 16 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HooshRah_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.