Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HIGU

Channel

HIGU

@Higu52

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

734subscribers

-1,217 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004472762714
TypeChannel
Usernames@Higu52 @StarsHerosine
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 13 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Higu52

Growth

7346,0663,40016 August 2026 — 1,951 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,951 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,114 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,184 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,367 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,212 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,330 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,066 subscribers29 August 2026 — 734 subscribers16 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 13 days, net -1,217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:34734-5,332
29 Aug 2026, 07:426,066+736
28 Aug 2026, 10:455,330+118
27 Aug 2026, 04:265,212-155
24 Aug 2026, 07:135,367+1,183
20 Aug 2026, 09:284,184+1,070
17 Aug 2026, 10:433,114+1,163
16 Aug 2026, 14:151,951no change
16 Aug 2026, 14:001,951first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.2%
avg views ÷ 734 subscribers
Avg views / post
999
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held40 (13 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total38,978
Reactions total1,340
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,340 reactions across 38 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41831.2%
🔥16212.1%
custom 53280335592088220031088.06%
custom 5422694848866061927876.49%
custom 5422873888872758210816.04%
🍾745.52%
custom 5422537279400868395614.55%
custom 5408874795158775963604.48%
🤯533.96%
👍513.81%
custom 5422631674192101311493.66%
custom 5422826721541914133352.61%
😈302.24%
custom 5424892626581091101261.94%
🏆171.27%
😎130.97%
custom 5346113301350737540100.746%
custom 531900714856534148150.373%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 39 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Higu52. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC259 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

777-кольцо Выдачи | выиграли

👍3

27 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC532 views142 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Леденец для своих🩸 Без реакции не выдаю) Итоги скоро

82🔥29🍾25🏆4😈2

26 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC773 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😇 нфт хэпибезд :: минутки 🤩 👋Условия:: @выдачи

🔥3618🍾18🏆3

26 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC750 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026

5 мишек минутка Выдал

15🔥9👍6

26 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC794 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍117

24 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC903 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Удалили аккаунт с четырьмя пепами…

17🔥5🤯5

24 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC898 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш на 💍 на минутку

20🔥5🍾3

24 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC973 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну следующая ставка точно залетит

10🤯4🏆2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Higu52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 688,909 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIGU” (@Higu52), 734 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Higu52.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.