Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

حرفِ آخر

@Harfe_Akhara

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,189subscribers

+1,021 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002207408946
TypeChannel
Username@Harfe_Akhara
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Harfe_Akhara

Growth

10,15411,18910,671.57 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,334 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,517 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,277 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,154 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,647 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,189 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1,021. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,999–11,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:1611,189+542
13 Aug 2026, 09:1410,647+493
12 Aug 2026, 09:1110,154-57
11 Aug 2026, 10:4310,211-66
10 Aug 2026, 09:0310,277-115
9 Aug 2026, 07:5410,392-125
8 Aug 2026, 08:4710,517+183
7 Aug 2026, 10:0010,334+166
7 Aug 2026, 03:3010,168no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:1810,168first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.1%
avg views ÷ 11,189 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.394%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held25 (14 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total118,894
Reactions total454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42
Videos
18
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

459 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥459100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC424 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

بعضی وقتا مجبوری ، تو فضای بغضت بخندی ، دلت بگیره ولی دلگیری نکنی ، شاکی بشی ولی شکایت نکنی ، گریه کنی اما نزاری اشکات پیدا بشن ، خیلی چیزارو ببینی ولی نادیدش بگیری ، خیلیا دلتو بشکنن و تو فقط سکوت کنی .

❤‍🔥11

Signed Zoe

13 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC≈20,500 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

دلم برای خودم میسوزه نه بچگی کردم نه جوانی یهو ب خودم اومدم دیدم باید از پس یه زندگی بر بیام ...❤️‍🩹

❤‍🔥15

Signed Zoe

13 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,170 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

خیلی از زخمامو نادیده گرفتم؛ چون چاقو دست ادمی بود که دوسش داشتم:)

❤‍🔥17

Signed Zoe

9 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC≈2,820 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026

یه شبایی آدم دلش میخواد فقط گریه کنه درست مثل امشب .

❤‍🔥31

Signed Zoe

8 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈3,140 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026

کاش میشد قلبم رو از سینم بکشم بیرون، دیگه خیلی داره اذیتم میکنه .

❤‍🔥23

Signed Zoe

6 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈19,700 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026

دیگه اینطوری شدم که از نظر بقیه مغرور و عصبیم، اما از نظر خودم به یه بغل نیاز دارم که توش بمیرم.

❤‍🔥53

Signed Zoe

4 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈6,000 views67 reactionsread 15 August 2026

من ادم رفتن نیستم اما اگر رفتم و نماندم، بدان تو بسیار قلبِ مرا آزردی.

❤‍🔥67

Signed Zoe

29 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC≈7,330 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026

راستش دیگه صلاح نیست من بهت پیام بدم نه حضورت ماند، نه خاطره‌ات رفت؛ به احترام تمام چیزهایی که بین ما ماند و گفته نشد... شاد باش... حتی اگر دیگه سهم من از حالِ خوبت، فقط همین دعا باشه تولدت مبارک.🎂❤️🥀

❤‍🔥56

Signed Zoe

29 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC≈6,780 views39 reactionsread 15 August 2026

به مو رسید، پاره شد. گره زدم بازم پاره شد، بیخیال شدم دیگه؛ زوری نیست که.

❤‍🔥39

Signed Zoe

29 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈6,350 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026

یجوری خاموش کردی اون ذوقمو که انگار ۳۰ تا گلوله تو قلبم خالی کردن.

❤‍🔥32

Signed Zoe

29 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈6,070 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

اگه یه روزی هم یاد من افتادی یادت نره من آدم رفتن نبودم تو منو از خودت جدا کردی.

❤‍🔥28

Signed Zoe

26 Jul 2026, 22:59 UTC≈5,730 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026

سعى كردم ساعت خوابمو درست كنم ولى ديدم دنيا فقط 11 تا 5 صبح بى سرو صدا و آرومه .

❤‍🔥21

Signed Zoe

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Harfe_Akhara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,180 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پروکسی ملی | Proxy MTProto
@Poroximel · 279,026
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حرفِ آخر” (@Harfe_Akhara), 11,189 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Harfe_Akhara.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.