Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hard indian Meme

Channel

Hard indian Meme

@HardindianMeme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,339subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146791869
TypeChannel
Username@HardindianMeme
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 30 June 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HardindianMeme

Growth

3,3383,3833,360.57 August 2026 — 3,383 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,383 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,376 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,369 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,348 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,345 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,338 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,339 subscribers3,3397 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,331–3,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 10:323,339+1
25 Aug 2026, 00:383,338-7
21 Aug 2026, 07:543,345-3
18 Aug 2026, 01:523,348-14
14 Aug 2026, 19:553,362-7
11 Aug 2026, 08:553,369-7
8 Aug 2026, 10:233,376-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:023,383no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:593,383first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭9044.1%
🤣3919.1%
2612.7%
💯2411.8%
👀157.35%
🤪62.94%
41.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2024 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HardindianMeme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 December 2024 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,680 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

15 Jul 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,960 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Yes we

9

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

14 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,050 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kya rate chal rha hai apke area Mein ?

2

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

13 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,930 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Guess kro 🥺

🤣9🤪4😭21

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 18:11 UTC≈3,790 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Jalalpur jattan Pakistan military installation Under heavy UAV firing

😭61

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:56 UTC≈4,760 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Illumination flares, POJK

😭82

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:55 UTC≈3,020 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Kharian cantt under heavy attack by Indian UAVs 100s of Pakistan AD missiles being launched to bring down Indian Swarm drones in Kharian Cantt, Kharian City, Gujrat district of Punjab province, Pakistan

😭41

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:54 UTC≈2,020 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Large scale counterattack by Indian forces in Alamgarh Jalalpur Jattan, Gujrat dist Pakistan Pakistan army can be seen using manual anti aircraft guns against the incoming drones. In most of the frontline Pak army defending the air attacks with manual anti aircraft guns

1

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:53 UTC≈1,580 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

NEELUM Valley,POJK

1

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:48 UTC≈1,510 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

India responds with much greater force. Swarm drones fired into Pakistan by India in response to their misdemeanor today. Video from Jalalpur jattan in Pakistan

1

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

9 May 2025, 17:47 UTC≈1,500 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚨 Kupwara: Indian Air Defence System INTERCEPTS Pakistani-fired UAVs.

1

Signed 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫 ⚓

6 Mar 2025, 11:44 UTC≈5,480 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭21🤣1

Signed 𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗮𝗱𝘆

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @HardindianMeme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 338,767 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hard indian Meme” (@HardindianMeme), 3,339 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HardindianMeme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.