reversing from the bottom ,shakeout ? 0x5aaa5Ad15F9881148D106DCF5C868035f46e1110

Channel
Gotti's Gems
@GottiGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,926subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001665565452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GottiGems |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GottiGems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 1,926 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,931 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 1,936 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 1,942 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 1,949 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,949 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://x.com/normierob/status/2077128832205598965?s=20
recovering from the dip , content is fire too , can't find any better narrative than normie on robinhood chain .
a lot of drama with all those launchpads and creator fees and all that shit , return to tradition and buy only v2 lp tokens with 0/0 tax . aped the dip
aped normie , launched from livo.trade ,we have seen this on eth , v2 uniswap launch so no launchpad fees ,creator fees and all that drama normie on base went to like 100m , what can normie do on robinhood chain , x2-3 bigger than coinbase? nfa/dyor 60k 0x5aaa5Ad15F9881148D106DCF5C868035f46e1110 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xac0be6455a2a680229001b34b53397fee4926db2
Holding good ,wen crime ? https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x0e468cc4479defd5401639120a7ed5fdd1cefb69
🔥1
https://t.me/rwaless
❤2
Achievement Unlocked: x30! ☄️ @GottiGems made a x30+ call on Rwaless. $14K ➡️ $428K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!
Photo, posted without a caption
https://x.com/_rudie_dz/status/2075540639429853512 nice thesis
I was not crazy I was early as usual
aped this on RH chain , useless coin of robinhood ? 0xcc68447A5aE88a563AF55b9b78eeDE4C9DC3eaa3 https://x.com/teppy_og/status/2075516632647237866 nfa/dyor 15k lowcap
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GottiGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gotti's Gems” (@GottiGems), 1,926 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GottiGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.