Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Global Football Hub

@Global_Football_Club

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,111subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003775968112
TypeChannel
Username@Global_Football_Club
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Global_Football_Club

Growth

1,1111,1371,1246 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,107–1,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:251,111-26
7 Aug 2026, 04:021,137+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:361,136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.8%
avg views ÷ 1,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
909
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total17,263
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14083.8%
👍116.59%
😡63.59%
🆒31.80%
🐳21.20%
👎21.20%
🥰21.20%
😁10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC53 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

High-intensity pressing and fluid tactical rotations dominate pre-season matches across top summer training tour venues.

5 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Young academy talents are making the most of summer tour minutes to earn permanent first-team roster spots.

1

4 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC163 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Transfer window negotiations are entering decisive phases as clubs push to complete squad depth requirements before domestic openers.

3 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC210 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

National team coaching staff are monitoring player sharpness during summer friendlies in preparation for upcoming international tournament qualifiers.

2 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC268 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

European clubs are wrapping up summer pre-season tours with intense friendly matches as managers finalize opening-day lineups.

1 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC334 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

National team managers are keeping a close eye on domestic squad form as preparations build toward future international qualifiers.

1

31 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC444 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Pre-season tours are providing breakout opportunities for young academy graduates competing for first-team roster spots.

30 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC619 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Matchday Drama: High pressing, tactical masterclasses, or sheer individual brilliance—what wins tight matches for you? Which club currently looks like the most complete team across all major leagues? Drop your picks! 👇

5

29 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,490 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Midweek Football Fever! The biggest clubs across Europe are facing off in high-intensity clashes this week. High stakes, intense atmospheres, and legendary moments are guaranteed. Discussion: What’s your score prediction for the biggest match on the schedule this week? Let us know in the comments! 📊

17👍7

28 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,650 views80 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 QJYWX2PYWPHQA6AXVOF4OOHGYM — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads on Telegram—they're not official

76👍4

28 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC≈3,330 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 7INQ4Y4S4KGIIOU5XC6ZW3UFPA — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 📱 Stay subscribed to this channel! More BIG BONUS CODES and exclusive rewards will be dropped later today. Don't miss the next one! 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads o

32😡6🐳2👎2🥰2

28 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,370 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚩 Game Flow vs. Precision: The Ongoing VAR Debate Video technology was introduced to eliminate clear error, but it has undeniably altered the natural rhythm of the game. Precision: Marginal offside calls prevent blatant unfair decisions. Momentum: Long review delays often drain the energy out of stadium atmospheres and momentum swings. 💬 Your take: Should VAR strictly focus on clear & obvious errors, or check eve

🆒31😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Global_Football_Club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 578,341 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Global Football Hub” (@Global_Football_Club), 1,111 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Global_Football_Club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.