Photo, posted without a caption
❤9

Channel
@GenuineAcademe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,715subscribers
-290 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002615462582 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GenuineAcademe |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GenuineAcademe |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 2,715 | -36 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 2,751 | -37 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 2,788 | -26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 2,814 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 2,832 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 2,858 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:53 | 2,873 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 2,891 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 2,905 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,918 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 2,936 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,949 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2,962 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 2,978 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 3,001 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 3,005 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 3,005 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
185 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 51.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 16.2% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 8.65% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 8.11% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 6.49% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 4.86% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.24% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.541% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9
یکی از بهترین فیلمهای ایرانی که دیدم اسپویل⬇️ اگه پایان خوش میخوای باید تاوانشو بدی #فیلم زنده شور @genuineacademe
🔥6❤1
سلام دوستان عزیزم ان شاالله اینستاگرام هم داریم راه میندازیم و خواستم ازتون بپرسم که:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥7❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
چطور بفهمی بهت دروغ میگن یا نه؟ سوگیری اعتماد چیه؟ و یک نکته دیگه:ایا فرد از دروغ گفتن درین زمینه سود میبره؟ @GenuineAcademe
❤8💯3
و همین هم شد شرط بندی ها به نفع ارژانتین بالا رفت و احتمال قوی ترامپ و نتانیاهو به نفع اسپانیا شرط بستن و برد بزرگی کردن اما مگه میشه در جام جهانی دست برد؟ و یک نکته دیگه این هست که ترامپ میگه این سوالات فوتبالی چیزیه که من متنفرم درگیرش هم ولی مضخرفه چون اون استاد بازی روانیه و وقتی نخواد جواب بده میدونیم که خیلی خوب بلده! @genuineAcademe #ترامپ #مسی
❤7👎1
گویا میشه قبل از شروع بازی یکی از بازیکنا داشت گریه میکرد مسی موقع گرم کردن حتی یک شوت توی چهارچوب نداشت حذف شدن بازیکنها عجیب بود وقتی همه اینهارو میذاریم کنار هم میشه احتمال زیادی داد که قضیه همینه! @genuineAcademe
❤8👎3
این موضوع رو وقتی این دو ویدیو رو دیدم حدس زدم و بعدش هم حدسم واقعی از کار درومد یک فرد بالارتبه هیچ وقت مثل بقیه الکی یک ویدیو یا مصاحبه نمیکنه پس همه چیز هدفی داره به نظر من هدف این دو ویدیو و حمایت شدید ترامپ و نتانیاهو از مسی این بود که شرط بندی به نفع ارژانتین زیاد بشه @genuineAcademe #نتانیاهو #ارژانتین #جام_جهانی
❤6👎2
اینو بخون تا بدونی روانشناست کاربلده یا نه ۳ راهکار درمانی اصلی وجود داره: 🥉ACT:acceptance commitment therapy میگه هراحساسی که میاد رو ببین و بپذیر اما بر اساس اون احساس مجبور نیستی عمل کنی 🎖مثلا اگه خشم سراغت اومد بگو احساسی به اسم خشم دارم،بهم میگه میز رو بشکونم و راهکار من این هست که به جای اینکار از خونه برم 🥈CBT:cognitive behavioral therapy روی افکار و رفتار تمرکز میکنه به ریشه و گذشته هیچکاری نداره 🎖مثلا م…
❤8👍4
چند تا نکته از مارلون براندو یاد بگیریم 1️⃣شوخی بدون زیاده روی یک شوخی خوب یعنی نسبت خندهدار بودنش به میزان توهینش بیرزه 2️⃣توجه کامل برقراری ارتباط چشمی و خم شدن رو به جلو و همچنین حضور ذهن داشتن در ناخوداگاه فرد مقابل حس باارزشی رو به تصویر میکشه 3️⃣مجذوب شدن دادن این حس که نتونستم حرفهات رو گوش کنم چون حواسم به صورتت پرت شد در حالتی که خود فرد اعتماد به نفس خوبی داره و زیاده روی نمیکنه خیلی جذابه! از طرفی خود…
❤9👍1🔥1
📽🎞فیلمهایی که دنیای مدرن رو نشونه رفتن #فیلم درخشش میگه ما هیچوقت از گذشته درس نگرفتیم هربار کار خودمون رو کردیم و در نهایت(پایان فیلم) مجبور شدیم دوباره توی هزار تو بیفتیم و تاوانش رو بدیم خون به پا خواهد شد میگه حکومتهای مدرن برای جون گرفتن ابتدا دست به دامن #دین حاکم برون کشور میشن و وقتی قدرت گرفتن و بالا اومدن در نهایت خود دین رو خرد میکنن(پایان فیلم) هفت میگه گناه وقتی همگانی شد از یاد میره! وقتی همه توی …
❤11👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GenuineAcademe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سلام دوستان عزیزم ان شاالله اینستاگرام هم داریم راه میندازیم و خواستم ازتون بپرسم که:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Genuine Academe” (@GenuineAcademe), 2,715 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GenuineAcademe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.