Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’‡๐’”๐’Š๐’‚๐’๐’ ๐‘ช๐’‰๐’‚๐’๐’๐’†๐’ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ

Channel

๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’‡๐’”๐’Š๐’‚๐’๐’ ๐‘ช๐’‰๐’‚๐’๐’๐’†๐’ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ

@Gafsiano_Channel

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

8,502subscribers

+1,158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004443163480
TypeChannel
Username@Gafsiano_Channel
Created12 July 2026 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gafsiano_Channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,3448,5027,9237 August 2026 โ€” 7,344 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 7,360 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 7,446 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 7,548 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 7,586 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 7,622 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 7,643 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 7,664 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 8,331 subscribers8 September 2026 โ€” 8,362 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 8,398 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 8,388 subscribers26 September 2026 โ€” 8,409 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 8,502 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 58 days, net +1,158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,170โ€“8,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 05:578,502+93
26 Sept 2026, 17:398,409+21
17 Sept 2026, 11:178,388-10
13 Sept 2026, 06:148,398+36
8 Sept 2026, 22:188,362+31
3 Sept 2026, 17:578,331+667
31 Aug 2026, 03:367,664+21
25 Aug 2026, 04:497,643+21
21 Aug 2026, 17:177,622+36
18 Aug 2026, 08:167,586+38
15 Aug 2026, 16:237,548+102
11 Aug 2026, 17:447,446+86
8 Aug 2026, 14:487,360+16
7 Aug 2026, 19:177,344first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 โ€” the reader has reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,078 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค77772.1%
๐Ÿ”ฅ18917.5%
๐Ÿฅฐ383.53%
โšก322.97%
๐Ÿ‘312.88%
๐ŸŽ‰50.464%
๐Ÿพ30.278%
๐Ÿ‘20.186%
๐Ÿ’Š10.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,078 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for ยท 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @Gafsiano_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTCโ‰ˆ8,720 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Max React โค๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ

โค33

30 Jul 2026, 23:55 UTCโ‰ˆ8,140 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @tunisiagang1

Sahriya lena chabeb https://t.me/+1aegOPPKaqQwYzY8

โค26๐Ÿ‘2๐ŸŽ‰1

27 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTCโ‰ˆ14,600 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://t.me/+VAqmMEKsviQ3ZWUx Witcher gang sa7a a7la ness ๐Ÿ‘Œ

โค11๐ŸŽ‰1๐Ÿ‘1

27 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTCโ‰ˆ13,200 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

10k loooled max partage bech ne7talo zokomo telegram m3a chella ๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ—ก๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€ https://t.me/Gafsiano_Channel

โค25๐Ÿ‘2

22 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTCโ‰ˆ16,800 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Maax reaaact gafsiano iss baack a9wwa min 9baaal

โค123๐Ÿพ3๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’Š1

20 Jul 2026, 21:58 UTCโ‰ˆ18,900 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ness lkol lena chabeb shriya lila https://t.me/+9cH9aiLN3vEzZWE0

โค34๐Ÿ‘1

14 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTCโ‰ˆ25,700 views114 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Max React ๐Ÿซถ

โค108๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐ŸŽ‰2

13 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTCโ‰ˆ27,700 views152 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

A3touna aka dharba share ls7abkom wo fikol blasa 5ali nhabtou group chat lena ๐Ÿ’Ž https://t.me/Gafsiano_Channel

โค149๐Ÿ‘3

12 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTCโ‰ˆ26,500 views308 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Beaucoup reactions La famille ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ164โค90โšก32๐Ÿฅฐ20๐Ÿ‘2

12 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTCโ‰ˆ27,800 views237 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Hana Rj3ana Max Share Ya World Systรจme wo 9o7bolojiya Apar b7odh Eli barcha nsetna hana Rj3ana bech na3mlou a9wa maison niko feha barcha cha7ta wo ta7ana https://t.me/Gafsiano_Channel

โค178๐Ÿ‘19๐Ÿ”ฅ19๐Ÿฅฐ18๐Ÿ‘2๐ŸŽ‰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Gafsiano_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’‡๐’”๐’Š๐’‚๐’๐’ ๐‘ช๐’‰๐’‚๐’๐’๐’†๐’ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณโ€ (@Gafsiano_Channel), 8,502 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gafsiano_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.