Channel
@GZFHBG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,251subscribers
-226 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003971185965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GZFHBG |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GZFHBG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 3,251 | -53 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 3,304 | -42 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 3,346 | -126 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 3,472 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 3,477 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 3,477 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,416 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#麦子 @maizi522 700 天河 人照课表差异： 没有差距课表都有 优点： 颜值绝对耐看杠杠的，可以放心冲，身材也很棒，胸是真的大 不足： 没有 补充： 麦老师长得很好看，一进门就被颜值吸引服务可以逼逼很会价，骚话也挺多值得2刷 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-19 投稿人: 散财童子 #历史投稿8194378378 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8280433281
#琪琪 @qimeng1688888 500 番禺 人照课表差异： 人照8成，进门看到穿着黑色睡衣的老师，在阳光下勾人心弦，看着只涂了口红没看出来有化妆的痕迹。 优点： 会主动大蟒🐍，并且很配合🐍到饱，🐍的很有女友感，会一边🐍一边搂着脖子，很听话，让老师慢慢来做各种前戏调情，老师都会很配合，还会害羞的嫣然一笑，各种动作都很配合。 不足： 浴室有点小，不太隔音。有点烟味。 补充： 中了半价和老师预约好，老师留了门。开门第一眼看到的是穿着黑色睡衣的漂亮少妇，坐在阳光底下的沙发上时不时害羞的笑，我主动引导她话题，坐下来的时候顺手摸了一下🐻，老师笑着说有点痒，交完水费后浴室有点小，我就快速洗漱并用上漱口水，擦干身体坐在床上，和老师贴得很紧，老师有点害羞还裹着毛巾被我一把扯下，四目相对直接吻了上去，手也没闲着顺着身体往老师的🐻上抓去，老师时不时发出嗯哼的声音，像女朋友一样，会不自觉搂着我的脖子迎合着🐍，坐着🐍了几分钟便把老师压在身…
#小泡泡 @xiaopaop07 600 天河 人照课表差异： 和照片视频差不多 优点： 老师态度非常好，很聊的来 不足： 过去有点远 补充： 提前一晚和老师约好了时间。因为周末路上有点堵，迟到了10分钟，心里挺不好意思的，生怕耽误老师的时间。见面后老师态度特别好，不仅没有怪我，还主动帮忙协调，让后面的客人稍微晚点来。为了表达歉意，我特意给老师转了一杯奶茶钱，随后就去洗澡了。 老师洗得非常仔细，洗完后便指引我到床上开始服务。动作由浅入深、一气呵成，口活和细节处理得都很到位，体验感非常舒适。接着换我主动服务，戴好套后顺势进入。在上方发力时，明显感觉触碰到了敏感点，对方瞬间紧缩反馈，体感相当强烈，就在这样的互动配合中顺利出水。 完事后老师又贴心地帮我清洗干净才离开。总体来说这次体验非常顺畅，哪怕中间出了一点小迟到的插曲，老师的包容和专业态度也让整趟行程非常舒心。 评分： 4 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-15 投稿…
#小雨 @yiyi776 600 番禺 人照课表差异： 人照八九成吧，差异不大，课表内容都有 优点： 嫩，水多，大长腿 ，身材好，瘦低大波，真胸，胸型非常好看，不上手可能会以为是科技胸。 不足： 预约的时候回消息慢，唯一缺点牙齿不好看 补充： 之前无意中关注到了小雨，一直想试一下，而且就在番禺，非常近，这两天正好中了群里的半价，缘分，必须出击。一顿操作，终于约上了，开门看到小雨，微笑的打招呼，大长腿嫩妹，人照基本符合频道图片的。与老师聊了一会儿天，脱光光，一起洗澡。脱下衣服的那一刻，看到圆润饱满又挺的咪咪，当下真有种科技胸的错觉，马上咸猪手，嗯，真胸无疑。小雨整体是比较瘦的，洗澡弯腰甚至看到明显肋骨形状，瘦低大波，天赋异禀了属于是。洗完澡 主动穿上紫色情趣，好看，嫩妹穿上成熟的紫色可太有韵味了。上来直接就是一个大蟒蛇，然后给我各种口，一开始有点齿感，沟通了一下，好多了。小雨的阴蒂很敏感，摸一会儿就水汪汪。戴套女上起手，紧…
#琪琪 @qimeng1688888 500 番禺 人照课表差异： 好看的少妇，不是嫩妹，浴室小没有陪浴，没做69 优点： 很热情，主动大蟒🐍，各种动作都很配合 不足： 有烟味，少妇有小肚子，个子不高 补充： 驱车前往番禺著名景点，有地下停车场，老师留门。开门第一眼是漂亮的少妇，时不时害羞笑，但是态度很好，交完水费后说浴室很小没法陪浴，出来后有一次性毛巾。坐在床上，四目相对忍不住蛇了起来，大蟒蛇很投入，边亲吻脸颊耳朵边嗅着少妇香水往🐻乃头探去，很有感觉。🐍到饱后让ls口一下擎天柱，上套翻身把ls压在身下，边吸着乃头边插入，紧度一般但是很润很暖，正常传教士后入，最后女上成功出水，ls最后还抱着温存一会。整体来说，很有感觉很舒服，不过不适合想吃嫩妹的狼友。 评分： 4 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-15 投稿人: 何弃疗 #历史投稿8017324335 投稿数: 2 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉…
#洁儿 @bbb8831 400 白云 人照课表差异： 7成像 优点： 皮肤挺白，屋子收拾的很干净 不足： 美颜有点重 补充： 本人和照片年龄差距有点大美颜重，没有上课走了，不是老师问题 评分： 3 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-13 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。
#姐妹花小鱼 @feifeibei 1000 天河 人照课表差异： 人照合一，课表写的都会做 优点： 服务跟态度都很好，高挑长腿 不足： 没发现 补充： 满满的女友感，情绪价值很高，服务从进门就开始了，全方位陪伴服务，根本不需要自己动手，床上服务也是一流，真会所服务，做的时候也很配合，反馈很不错。 评分： 4 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-13 投稿人: 何弃疗 #历史投稿8017324335 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。
#姐妹花小鱼 @feifeibei 1000 天河 人照课表差异： 基本无差，服务都是跟着课表来 优点： 纯纯的i人自来熟，颜值高身材苗条，态度很好进门开始全程贴身服务。 不足： 手脚都有大面积纹身，无🐍 补充： 顶着大太阳正午出击，到楼下的时候老师说要稍等一下，还以为我的罚站体质又要发力了，索性没两分钟老师就回我说好了，遥控上楼，出电梯就看到老师在门口等着了，门打开看到老师穿着一袭白色长裙，配上可爱的脸蛋，妥妥的一个小甜妹，进门坐下老师就给拿了一瓶冰水，喝下去的那一刻感觉人活过来了，老师看我出了一身汗，也是过来帮我扒光然后一起去洗澡了，洗干净后还帮忙擦身，完事拖着我的手带我进房间。房间里面挂着一排qqny可以随意选择，让小鱼换上一套女仆装然后开始服务，会所出身的老师服务这块没得说，各式各样的都来了一遍。接着就是口了，老二从进门开始就对老师敬礼了，被小鱼一口含进去的时候差点爽到叫出来了，难怪老师说百分之八十的人都倒在这里…
#麦子 @maizi522 700 天河 人照课表差异： 课表上的都有 优点： 高挑大胸逼逼会夹 不足： 都挺好的 补充： 没有落差感,服务态度和质量算是T0级别的存在,全程主动 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-12 投稿人: Josh... #历史投稿8098065849 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。
#圆圆 @yuanyuan8769 700 天河 人照课表差异： 本人比照片可爱，幼态甜妹 优点： 乖巧听话，小巧玲珑，高度配合，慢慢引导有女友的感觉，粉嫩紧致，给出话题比较健谈 不足： 教室整洁就是空间不大，其他没有任何问题 补充： 结束一天劳累的工作，提前约好圆圆，抽奖看到的嫩妹，一眼就心动了，直接加购了，由于距离太远，所以没有早联系，是一个小宝藏，遥控指挥上楼，一推开门一个娇小的甜妹在门后等候，芊芊细腰单手可握，嘴角带笑，眉眼弯弯，犹如那青涩的苹果等待采摘，交了水费，轻松愉快的聊了一会，便拉着进了浴室，调好水温，丝丝水雾泛起，也遮挡不了那甜美的面容，倒添起一股淡淡的朦胧美，细细的清洗，我忍不住上下其手，浴室嘻嘻笑笑气氛格外轻松，相拥上床，仔细感受了一下那柔弱的身躯，低头轻轻点了一下那朱唇，便开始体验嫩妹的服务，只手轻抚娇躯，灵活的舌头从上到下，浅浅的上下浮动，包裹性满满，不一会就已经感觉到位，将圆圆翻身压下，捧着那…
#洁儿 @bbb8831 400 白云 人照课表差异： 八九成 优点： 态度好 不足： 无 补充： 进门看见老师身材凹凸有致，特别是胸前那对大灯，三个字形容：大、白、软，交了课费就把我拉入进浴室洗澡，完了出来就开始重点服务，AB面该做的都做了，特别是口，技术一流，舒服得很，口硬老师先上，看着一对大灯晃来晃去，真是爽，只能意会不能言传，老师下面又紧水又多，刺激得不行，没几分钟就交了货了，老师的服务让我一直回味无穷！极力推荐！ 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-08-07 投稿人: 兢兢业业 #历史投稿6211801725 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GZFHBG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,042,345 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“繁花报告” (@GZFHBG), 3,251 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZFHBG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.