Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JokeBoxx - Freunde der Lustigkeit ๐Ÿ˜Š

Channel

JokeBoxx - Freunde der Lustigkeit ๐Ÿ˜Š

@FreundeDerLustigkeit

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

4,350subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001589080784
TypeChannel
Username@FreundeDerLustigkeit
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FreundeDerLustigkeit

Growth

4,3504,3624,3567 August 2026 โ€” 4,362 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 4,362 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 4,357 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 4,350 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 4,348โ€“4,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:354,350-7
10 Aug 2026, 02:314,357-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:454,362no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:354,362first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2023 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

3,910 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿคฃ1,52839.1%
๐Ÿ˜97625.0%
๐Ÿ‘61215.7%
โค2496.37%
๐Ÿ‘Ž1152.94%
๐Ÿคฎ1102.81%
๐Ÿฅด501.28%
๐Ÿ™ˆ380.972%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ310.793%
๐Ÿคก250.639%
๐Ÿ’ฏ230.588%
๐Ÿคฌ200.512%
๐Ÿฅฑ200.512%
๐Ÿ‘ป170.435%
๐Ÿ‘140.358%
๐Ÿ’ฉ130.332%
๐Ÿ”ฅ130.332%
๐Ÿคจ130.332%
๐Ÿฅฐ100.256%
๐Ÿ˜ก80.205%
11 further kinds250.639%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3,910reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2023 to 20 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2023, 02:19 UTCโ‰ˆ42,200 views226 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Na dann, Prost๐Ÿป๐Ÿป๐Ÿป

๐Ÿ˜139๐Ÿ‘30๐Ÿคฃ29โค7๐Ÿ‘Ž6๐Ÿ‘ป6๐Ÿณ3๐Ÿ‘€3

20 Sept 2023, 02:15 UTCโ‰ˆ38,800 views137 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ™ˆ๐Ÿ™ˆ๐Ÿ™ˆ

๐Ÿ˜89๐Ÿ™ˆ16๐Ÿคฃ9๐Ÿ’ฉ6๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘5โค2๐Ÿ‘Ž2

20 Sept 2023, 02:00 UTCโ‰ˆ32,500 views123 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Was denn sonst?๐Ÿ™ˆ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚

๐Ÿคฃ108๐Ÿ‘11๐Ÿ‘Ž3๐Ÿฅฐ1

20 Sept 2023, 01:56 UTCโ‰ˆ29,800 views118 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฃ61๐Ÿ˜32๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿคฎ6๐Ÿคฏ5โค3๐Ÿ‘1

20 Sept 2023, 01:52 UTCโ‰ˆ26,000 views105 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜73๐Ÿ‘15๐Ÿ”ฅ10๐Ÿคฃ5โค2

20 Sept 2023, 01:51 UTCโ‰ˆ23,900 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜62๐Ÿคฃ12๐Ÿฅฑ6โค3๐Ÿ‘2

20 Sept 2023, 01:49 UTCโ‰ˆ22,300 views124 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฎ62๐Ÿ˜26๐Ÿคฃ14๐Ÿ™ˆ10๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ˜ฑ5๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿคก1

20 Sept 2023, 01:49 UTCโ‰ˆ21,400 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฃ98๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿคฎ5๐Ÿ˜1

20 Sept 2023, 01:46 UTCโ‰ˆ19,900 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฃ58๐Ÿ‘27๐Ÿ˜6โค3

20 Sept 2023, 01:44 UTCโ‰ˆ19,500 views88 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘39๐Ÿคฃ24๐Ÿ™ˆ11๐Ÿ˜ฑ5โค4๐Ÿคฎ2๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ’ฉ1

20 Sept 2023, 01:42 UTCโ‰ˆ18,800 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿคฃ59๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿฅด2โค1๐Ÿ˜1

14 Apr 2023, 14:27 UTCโ‰ˆ45,300 views419 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Und tschรผss ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ Beitreten und lustig sein ๐Ÿ˜Š

๐Ÿ˜261๐Ÿคฃ68๐Ÿ‘55โค13๐Ÿ‘ป10๐Ÿฅด6๐Ÿคก3๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreundeDerLustigkeit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,393,679 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œJokeBoxx - Freunde der Lustigkeit ๐Ÿ˜Šโ€ (@FreundeDerLustigkeit), 4,350 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreundeDerLustigkeit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.