Channel photo updated

Channel
Amoor💗
@Fot1mam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001452464906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fot1mam |
| Description | بِسْـــــــــــــــمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّ حْمَنِ الرَّ حِيم🕊 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ الرُّوحُ الجَمِيلَةُ تَرَى السَّعَادَةَ فِي أَبْسَطِ الأَشْيَاء. "Чиройли калб энг оддий нарсалардан бахт топади"☺️❤️ инста:@farangiz.__ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fot1mam |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,660
- Videos
- ≈2,750
- Links
- ≈559
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 51s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2022 to 15 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «Amoor💗»
@Laza_store🤍 #64_ishtrokchi 😳VIDEODAGI LED WATCH SOATLAR 39% SKIDKA BILAN ATIGI 44.000😱 HARID QILISHINGIZ MUMKIN🤩 KANAL SSILKASI👉 https://t.me/Laza_store https://t.me/Laza_store
👍1
Signed 💕
Nimani his qildiz😭 @mubine_pg
Signed Фарангиз.
🙂👋🏻
Signed Фарангиз.
Лайлатул қадр кечасининг тартиби: ЧОРШАНБАДАН ПАЙШАНБА УТАР КЕЧАСИ ДЕЙИЛИБДИ .. § Соат 21:30 дан соат 23:30 гача хуфтон, таровеҳ намозлари ва илм мажлисларида бўлиш. § Соат 23: 30 дан 24:00 гача зикр, дуо ва муножот. § Соат 24:00 дан 24: 30 гача бироз дам олиш (ёки саҳарлик тановул қилиш). § Соат 24:30 дан 01:15 гача таҳажжуд намозини ўқиш. § Соат 01:15 дан 01:45 гача зикр ва тасбеҳ айтиш. § Масалан: "Субҳоналлоҳи ва…
👍1
Signed 💕
𝙌𝙖𝙙𝙧 𝙠𝙚𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙖 ò𝙦𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙜𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙪𝙤🌙 𝘼𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙖 𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙖𝙠𝙖 𝙖𝙛𝙪𝙫𝙫𝙪𝙣, 𝙩𝙪𝙝𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙪𝙡 𝙖𝙛𝙫𝙖 𝙛𝙖'𝙛𝙪 𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙮 ~ 𝙁𝘼𝙔𝙕𝙇𝙄 𝙆𝙀𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙇𝘼𝙍 🌚 𝐹𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑚🕊️
Signed 💕
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 💕
😊😘
🥰1
Signed ....
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 💕
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Фарангиз.
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Фарангиз.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fot1mam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Fot1mam named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Amoor💗” (@Fot1mam). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fot1mam.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.