Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Footprint Analytics

Supergroup

Footprint Analytics

@Footprint_Analytics

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,167members

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

19 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001572461639
TypeSupergroup
Username@Footprint_Analytics
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 October 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Footprint_Analytics

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1671,1931,1806 August 2026 — 1,180 members10 August 2026 — 1,177 members13 August 2026 — 1,174 members17 August 2026 — 1,180 members20 August 2026 — 1,186 members23 August 2026 — 1,184 members29 August 2026 — 1,186 members2 September 2026 — 1,189 members6 September 2026 — 1,188 members11 September 2026 — 1,190 members14 September 2026 — 1,192 members19 September 2026 — 1,193 members29 September 2026 — 1,179 members5 October 2026 — 1,179 members7 October 2026 — 1,171 members13 October 2026 — 1,167 members6 August 202613 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 68 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,163–1,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
13 Oct 2026, 01:501,167-4
7 Oct 2026, 02:181,171-8
5 Oct 2026, 01:361,179no change
29 Sept 2026, 22:351,179-14
19 Sept 2026, 17:161,193+1
14 Sept 2026, 20:011,192+2
11 Sept 2026, 11:411,190+2
6 Sept 2026, 18:011,188-1
2 Sept 2026, 04:131,189+3
29 Aug 2026, 18:141,186+2
23 Aug 2026, 11:181,184-2
20 Aug 2026, 05:351,186+6
17 Aug 2026, 10:351,180+6
13 Aug 2026, 10:071,174-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:031,177-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:071,180first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Footprint Analytics” (@Footprint_Analytics), 1,167 members as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Footprint_Analytics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.